Blog

  • Turnover in Washoe County ROV Office Still Raising Questions

    It might seem like I am harping on the subject, but Washoe County has seen four registrars of voters in just two years, with the most recent one leaving just before the upcoming election. The revolving door of election officials has raised concerns among residents, prompting questions about what is happening behind the scenes.

    While the media has reported that these officials are feeling harassed by the public, some speculate that the pressure may not be coming from the public but from within county leadership. Critics are questioning whether the County Manager or higher-ups are exerting undue influence on the registrar as basic inquiries about voting patterns and election integrity continue to go unanswered.

    Meanwhile, questions surrounding the 2020 election remain unresolved, including why Nevada’s two largest counties—Washoe and Clark—exhibited nearly identical voting patterns despite being separated by vast distances and why cast vote records show instances of Republican ballots seemingly flipping to Democratic votes. Another issue is the predictability of precinct results, with some alleging that outcomes in just three precincts are being used to forecast the results in all others.

    Despite the concerns, election officials, including the Secretary of State and District Attorney, have yet to provide satisfactory explanations, leaving many to wonder why there is continued turnover in the registrar’s office and a lack of transparency on these critical issues. The press, too, has been criticized for its reluctance to cover these ongoing concerns.

  • Nevada Writers Hall of Fame Leaves Comstock Talent in the Dust

    Ah, the Annual Nevada Writers Hall of Fame— a glittering event where literary luminaries gather to celebrate the written word. But this year, they have pulled a classic Comstock move: overlooking the very essence of Nevada storytelling.

    On Friday, November 1, the University Libraries will be hosting their annual soirée, where the literati will gather to sip wine, nibble on hors d’oeuvres, and pretend they have captured the true essence of Nevada—by which is meant, the essence that never got within 50 miles of a mine shaft or a brothel.

    The newest honorees? Michael Branch and Laura Newman.

    Do not go wrong—these fine folks have written a thing or two. Branch, for instance, is the proud author of over 300 essays and an entire book about jackalopes—yes, you read that right, jackalopes, because nothing says Nevada grit quite like a mythological rabbit with antlers. And then there is Laura Newman, who once conquered the dangerous world of KOLO-TV sales and wrote a collection of short stories, which is great if your idea of frontier hardship is dealing with ad buyers.

    But where are the writers who have inhaled the dust of a collapsing mineshaft or thrown out of a saloon for starting a fight over whose typewriter is faster? Where are they who have printed out their stories on newspaper presses that smelled like printer ink and despair?

    Where are Janice Oberding, Bill Brown, Karen Woodmansee, Nick Nicosia, Brenda Kime Findley, Taylor Hamby and Melody Hoover? Not in the Hall of Fame.

    The ceremony, of course, is set to take place in the Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center, which it is assumed is the sort of place where they talk a lot about “literary merit” and “Nevada’s imagination” without anyone, actually imagining how others are keeping straight faces. Dean Catherine Cardwell will lead the charge, likely with the same enthusiasm one reserves for introducing authors who have never stepped foot in the roughest corners of the Silver State.

    The evening begins at 7 p.m., followed by—what else?—a dessert and wine reception, where attendees will surely bond over a shared experience of not having written about anything remotely involving dynamite or ghost towns. Let us picture it—the grand ballroom, chandeliers twinkling, and there, in the corner, a lone tumbleweed rolls by.

    The stage is set. The crowd hushes as the MC steps up to the podium.

    MC: “Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed writers, and that one guy who accidentally wandered in from the casino—welcome to the Annual Nevada Writers Hall of Fame! Tonight, we honor the literary giants who’ve graced our state with their prose, poetry, and occasional ransom notes.

    Applause. Another tumbleweed blows across the stage for effect.

    MC: “Now, let’s dive into the inductees. First up, we have Jane Austen. Wait, no, my mistake—that’s Jane from the local eatery. She’s been writing her memoirs on restaurant napkins. Jane, stand up! Oh, she’s already standing. And swaying. Excellent.”

    Jane raises her glass, sloshing winey onto her “Best Author” sash.

    MC: “Next, the brilliant Edgar Allan Poe! Oh, wait, that’s just Gary from the gas station. He pens haikus about Slim Jims and existential dread. Gary, your ode to the Slurpee machine touched our souls.”

    Gary nods, adjusting his coon skin cap.

    MC: “And now, the pièce de résistance—the Comstock Chronicles! These unsung heroes have wrestled with pens, typewriters, and occasionally each other after a few shots of whiskey. Their stories? Legendary. Their spelling? Questionable.”

    The spotlight swings to the Comstock table. Lester Michaelson, the grizzled bard, raises his hand.

    Lester: “Y’all forgot me last year too. I wrote a poem about tumbleweeds mating during a dust storm. It was deep, man. Real deep.”

    The audience shifts uncomfortably.

    MC: “Ah, yes, Lester. Your poem—“Love in the Time of Sandstorms.” Truly groundbreaking.”

    Lester squints at the silver medals drawn from a furnace using the finest silver from South Africa.

    MC: “And let’s not forget our keynote speaker, Stephen King! Wait, no, that is just Steve from the pawnshop. He writes horror stories about overdue electric bills. Terrifying stuff.”

    Steve waves, clutching a broken toaster.

    Lester: “Gary, you think they’ll ever notice us?”

    Gary: “Nah, Lester. We’re like footnotes in a tumbleweed’s diary. But hey, at least we spiked the punch bowl.”

    And so, the Annual Nevada Writers Hall of Fame continues—a literary rodeo where the tumbleweeds write their legends, and the wine flows like forgotten metaphors

    But wait, it gets better. In addition to the main event, the honorees will be gracing us with their presence at a Nevada Humanities’ Literary Crawl, where they’ll participate in a panel discussion titled “Writing the Desert West in Fact and Fiction.”

    Spoiler alert: it is a guess, but the High Desert West did not involve trying to survive a Costco run in Reno or Caron City traffic. But hey, what does anyone know?

    Branch’s collection of essays on desert humor and Newman’s 95-word short fiction contests are both captivating reads. Who would not want to read a story just long enough to fill the back of a whiskey bottle? But let us be honest—the Hall of Fame business feels about as connected to Nevada’s rough-and-tumble history as a poetry reading during a gunfight.

    If you are wondering how much it costs to attend this literary gala, tickets are a steal at $25—though, sadly, that does not include the cost of dignity for those of us from the Comstock, who will no doubt be choking back laughter (or tears) from the cheap seats. Free parking is available in the Whalen Parking Complex, perfect for anyone who wants to leave early without having to pay for the privilege of escaping before someone recites a poem about tumbleweeds.

    So, mark your calendars. The Nevada Writers Hall of Fame is ready to celebrate yet another year of not the Comstock. Because the real action these days is in book clubs, not the backrooms of Virginia City saloons.

    But do not worry, the Comstock will still be here—writing stories far too gritty, too real, and too compelling for the Hall of Fame.

  • Li3 Lithium Renamed Global Copper

    Li3 Lithium Corp. has changed its name to Global Copper Corp. following shareholder approval at its annual and special meeting on Thursday, August 22.

    The company’s common shares began trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the new ticker symbol, “CUCU,” on Thursday, September 12. A new CUSIP number was assigned, but shareholders will not be required to take action, as existing share certificates will remain valid.

    The name change reflects the company’s shift toward focusing on its Northern Lights Copper Project about 15 miles southeast of Yerington, in the Walker Lane Trend. The project spans 1,200 acres near Nevada Copper Corporation’s Pumpkin Hollow mine.

    Li3 Lithium, now Global Copper Corp., plans to conduct additional surface exploration followed by drilling to confirm a high-grade copper deposit at Northern Lights. The company plans to establish a mineable resource in an area known for copper production and exploration.

    Li3 Lithium Corp. has changed its name to Global Copper Corp. following shareholder approval at its annual and special meeting on Thursday, August 22.

    The company’s common shares began trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the new ticker symbol, “CUCU,” on Thursday, September 12. A new CUSIP number was assigned, but shareholders will not be required to take action, as existing share certificates will remain valid.

    The name change reflects the company’s shift toward focusing on its Northern Lights Copper Project about 15 miles southeast of Yerington, in the Walker Lane Trend. The project spans 1,200 acres near Nevada Copper Corporation’s Pumpkin Hollow mine.

    Li3 Lithium, now Global Copper Corp., plans to conduct additional surface exploration followed by drilling to confirm a high-grade copper deposit at Northern Lights. The company plans to establish a mineable resource in an area known for copper production and exploration.

  • IRS Expands Tax Program to Benefit Nevada Taxpayers

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is expanding its Direct File program, allowing more Nevada taxpayers to file taxes directly with the agency for free.

    The program, which enables individuals to calculate and submit their tax returns without relying on commercial tax preparation software, will be available during the 2025 filing season. Initially launched as a pilot in 2024, the Direct File program was accessible to select taxpayers in Nevada.

    The pilot program allowed taxpayers with straightforward W-2 income to calculate and file their returns directly. The new eligibility standards also authorize 1099 and various tax credits, such as the Child and Dependent Care Credit and the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit, to utilize the system.

    While the expansion of the Direct File program is a positive development for many taxpayers, it has faced criticism from commercial tax preparation firms that profit from providing these services. Furthermore, a recent IRS inspector general report revealed that the agency has not adequately protected taxpayer data within its Free File Alliance, a separate initiative that offers free tax preparation services to low- and middle-income individuals.

    Under the Inflation Reduction Act, the IRS explored the feasibility of a Direct File system as part of the funding, which President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. The agency received $15 million in taxpayer funding and a nine-month timeline to report on how the program would function, paving the way for the expansion in 2025.

  • Nevada Voters Urged to Guard Against Ballot Harvesting

    As the election approaches in Nevada, many residents are raising concerns over the state ballot harvesting practices and the integrity of the voting process. With a six-week election window and widespread mail-in ballots, questions about the safety and security of the system are becoming more pronounced.

    In Nevada, ballot harvesting allows individuals to collect multiple ballots from voters and deliver them to polling locations or the Registrar of Voters’ Office. Critics argue that this practice opens the door to potential manipulation and fraud.

    “One person could go pick up all the ballots for Washoe County and deliver them,” one concerned voter explained, adding, “Doesn’t seem right, does it?”

    The Registrar of Voters in Washoe County has faced scrutiny for allowing third parties to send ballots to nearly every county resident—alive or deceased, living in-state or out, even those with invalid addresses. Emails and lawsuits, though disregarded by the Washoe County District Attorney’s office and the local and state judiciary, have pointed to evidence of negligence in verifying voter rolls.

    Voters are encouraged to take matters into their own hands to avoid potential issues. Experts recommend dropping off ballots personally or entrusting them to someone reliable rather than relying on mail.

    “If you can’t drop it off yourself, give it to a trusted person,” the advice goes.

    Transparency concerns continue to dominate the conversation, with some worried that bad actors could track who has voted and manipulate the system accordingly. Fears of data tampering have also been found with GOP ballots flipped to Democratic votes.

    Despite these allegations, local election officials and law enforcement have remained tight-lipped.

    To address growing unease, Edward Solomon will present his findings  from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m, at Boomtown on Friday, October 11, revealing details from Washoe County’s certified data. The Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, Washoe County Registrar of Voters, and Washoe County District Attorney Chris Hicks have been invited to participate and answer why the two largest counties in Nevada show near-identical precinct voting results while other counties do not.

    Critics demand clarity on the issue. The upcoming event provides a critical opportunity for election officials to address concerns, but many are skeptical.

    “Will they show up and explain? Or will it be more of the same?” one person questioned, suggesting that a no-show would further erode public trust.

    As the November election looms, voter skepticism grows, and all eyes are on Nevada’s election officials.

  • BLM to Conduct Horse and Burro Gather Near Susanville

    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will gather horses and burros near the California border northeast of Susanville starting Tuesday, October 1. The operation will last at least 15 days, removing approximately 870 horses from the rangeland.

    BLM officials say it is to bring the population closer to the appropriate management level.

    “While our gather in 2022 reduced populations, additional removals are needed to bring the population down to the appropriate management level of 448 to 758 wild horses,” said BLM Eagle Lake Field Manager Emily Ryan. “These high populations are causing rangeland degradation in the herd management area, with wild horses using more than their allocated forage and damaging riparian areas, wetlands, and cultural resource sites.”

    The gathering is part of an ongoing effort to manage the wild horse and burro population. BLM estimates that approximately 1,800 wild horses and 140 wild burros currently inhabit the area, which spans over 800,000 acres.

    The public is welcome to observe the gather operations by reserving a spot at least one day in advance by calling 530-252-5332. Observation groups will be limited to 10 people per day.

  • Former Washoe County Health Director Sues County for $300K

    Amber Howell, the former director of Washoe County Health and Human Services, has filed a $300,000 lawsuit against the county, alleging retaliation and discrimination after she reported federal policy violations.

    The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Nevada, claims county employees targeted Howell after she flagged misconduct related to county housing programs. Howell states that in the summer of 2022, she discovered that a county employee overseeing the Continuum of Care program was giving preferential treatment to a homeless client at the Cares Campus.

    The client, despite a low housing assessment score, a criminal background, and accusations of mistreating staff, was allegedly moved to the top of the wait list for federal housing vouchers and secured a permanent housing match. Howell asserts that this action violated U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development policies.

    Howell claims she raised concerns with an assistant county manager, but no action was taken. In April 2023, Howell says the county launched an investigation into her following complaints from county employees who accused her of substance use on the job.

    Despite testing negative for drugs and alcohol, Howell was placed on unpaid leave weeks later.

    During the investigation, Howell says she was diagnosed with multiple mental health disorders and began seeking treatment. She notified the county of her conditions and requested leave under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). However, in July 2023, she received a letter from the county manager recommending that the county commissioners terminate her employment.

    According to Howell’s attorneys, the county forced her resignation by pressuring her to release her health records in a public meeting if she challenged her termination. They argue that the county retaliated against Howell for flagging the initial policy violations and discriminated against her by failing to provide reasonable accommodations as required by federal law under the ADA.

  • Washoe County Interim ROV Takes Leave Ahead of Election

    Just weeks before early voting and Election Day, Washoe County’s interim Registrar of Voters (ROV), Cari-Ann Burgess, has requested a leave of absence due to personal stress.

    The recommendation came from County Manager Eric Brown, who cited “self-identified personal stress” as the reason for the decision in an email sent to the Washoe County Board of Commissioners. In his email, Brown emphasized that while he suggested a leave of absence, he did not ask Burgess to step down despite staff leaving a meeting with that impression.

    Brown also highlighted concerns about Burgess’ recent behavior. The county’s Human Resources department still has to meet with Burgess to finalize her leave and the ROV team to address any possible confusion.

    It marks the third time Washoe County has seen a registrar step down in just over two years. Burgess assumed the interim role in January 2023 after the resignation of Jamie Rodriguez, who cited long hours and the need for a better work-life balance.

    Rodriguez herself had replaced former Registrar Deanna Spikula, who resigned after 15 years, citing harassment and threats from the public. Despite Spikula’s claims, the Nevada Secretary of State found no credible evidence to support her allegations.

    Recent controversies include misprinted ballots that cost the county $178,000 in reprints and the refusal of the Washoe County Commission to certify primary election recount results. After pressure, the commission eventually reversed its decision, certifying the election.

    Washoe County officials have assured the public that the ROV office is prepared for the upcoming election, with Deputy Registrar Andrew McDonald and experienced staff stepping in to ensure smooth operations. However, the high turnover has sparked criticism, particularly from Washoe County Commissioner Mike Clark, who has blamed management and described the situation as “embarrassing” for the county.

    Clark and Commissioner Jeanne Herman have been vocal critics of County Manager Eric Brown and have repeatedly questioned the integrity of the county’s election process. Their stance aligns with Robert Beadles, who has unsuccessfully sought to remove Brown and other county officials through lawsuits, claiming election results remain skewed.

    As the general election approaches, the Nevada Secretary of State’s Office has reiterated its support for the Washoe County ROV office, affirming that they are working closely to ensure a successful election process.

    Brown has been a key figure in each event.

  • Google Faces Antitrust Trial Over Alleged Online Ad Monopoly

    As Google expands its footprint in Storey County, its antitrust battle escalated as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) opened its case against the tech giant in a Virginia courtroom, accusing it of monopolizing the online advertising market.

    Prosecutors claim that Google has dominated the infrastructure behind online ad sales, controlling more than 150,000 transactions every second. The trial, overseen by U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema, will determine if Google used its size and influence to eliminate competition and restrict customer options.

    In her opening statement, DOJ attorney Julia Tarver Wood argued that Google used monopoly-building tactics by acquiring competitors, locking in customers, and controlling how transactions with the online ad market took place.

    “Google is not here because they are big,” Wood said. “They are here because they used that size to crush competition.”

    Google’s defense, led by attorney Karen Dunn, countered by saying that the DOJ’s case relies on outdated views of the industry. She pointed out that Google’s tools now work with competitors’ systems and that the company faces stiff competition from Amazon, Comcast, and others in the rapidly changing digital ad market. Dunn likened the DOJ’s case to a “time capsule” filled with relics like BlackBerries and Blockbuster cards, reflecting an earlier era.

    The DOJ aims to show that Google’s control over the tools used by publishers and advertisers has stifled competition, leaving companies like Gannett and News Corp dependent on Google’s platform. Gannett executive Tim Wolfe testified that the company has been tied to Google’s ad server for over a decade with few alternatives. Similarly, former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser said her company was “held hostage” by Google, which controlled a significant portion of its ad transactions.

    If the court rules against Google, the DOJ could demand the divestiture of Google Ad Manager, a platform that includes its publisher ad server and ad exchange. The trial comes amid a wave of antitrust cases against Big Tech, with the DOJ recently winning a separate ruling against Google in a search monopoly case and launching lawsuits against Apple.

    The trial could last several weeks.

  • High Graduation Rates Despite Low Proficiency, Questioned

    A troubling disconnect between Nevada’s high school graduation rates and student proficiency levels in core subjects has raised questions about the state’s education system.

    While over 80 percent of Nevada’s high school students graduate, data reveals that only 20 percent are proficient in math, and less than 50 percent are proficient in math and English. The disparity has led many to ask how the state can report high graduation rates despite low academic performance.

    In an email exchange with the Nevada Department of Education (NV DOE), the agency admitted that students must participate in assessments for English Language Arts (ELA) and math to graduate but are not required to meet any specific proficiency level on these tests.

    “Proficiency levels on both assessments are not used to calculate the graduation rate,” the email stated.

    The revelation means that graduation status is not contingent on performance in these core academic subjects.

    The explanation has raised concerns about the validity of the graduation rate as an indicator of student readiness. Critics argue that mandating proficiency tests without requiring students to demonstrate proficiency undermines the purpose of education.

    One frustrated observer questioned, “Why are students mandated to take proficiency tests as a graduation requirement if proficiency isn’t a requirement for graduation? What is the requirement—having a pulse?”

    The Nevada Department of Education (NV DOE) has issued a 22-page manual explaining how they calculate graduation rates, but many individuals have found the document too complicated to understand.

    The difficulty in assessing data on graduation metrics has only fueled suspicion that the education system is masking the issue.