Nevada Senator Jacky Rosen has begun preparing for reelection, which in modern politics resembles the opening days of a traveling medicine show. There is much smiling, and handshaking, and an effort to convince the public that ordinary ambitions are actually noble sacrifices.
Senator Rosen wishes voters to know she is “bipartisan,” a word now used in Washington much the way frontier gamblers once used the phrase “honest dealing,” frequently, loudly, and usually when suspicion was already present.
Now, Nevada presents a peculiar difficulty for politicians. The state changes population faster than a Reno slot machine changes fortunes.
Californians arrive daily seeking freedom from the policies they spent decades voting for, then immediately begin searching for candidates promising similar policies with better scenery. Meanwhile, lifelong Nevadans glare suspiciously from pickup trucks while wondering how many more subdivisions must appear before the state officially becomes one giant HOA.
It leaves politicians performing an endless balancing act. Every election becomes a contest to determine who can appear moderate enough for suburban independents while still convincing their own party they have not secretly joined a cult.
Senator Rosen has embraced this ritual enthusiastically.
She emphasizes her willingness to “work across party lines,” which is admirable in theory, but in Washington, bipartisan cooperation often means both parties agreeing to spend money the country does not possess.
Her supporters point proudly to instances where she departed from Democratic orthodoxy. She sided with Republicans on a police accountability resolution and called for freezing Iranian assets following the Hamas attacks against Israel.
These are presented as proof of independent courage, though in truth they mostly demonstrate that even modern politicians occasionally glance at reality before consulting party leadership. Still, Republicans remain unimpressed.
They note that according to FiveThirtyEight’s tracking, Senator Rosen voted with the Biden administration 93% of the time, which makes her bipartisan in the same sense as a man eating salad beside his cheeseburger is “diet-conscious.”
It, naturally, is where the campaign’s great comedy begins.
Every vulnerable senator in America suddenly rediscovers individuality during election season. The television ads arrive first.
Somber music plays as the candidate walks through a factory wearing a hard hat so clean it still contains manufacturing creases. The narrator explains that Senator So-and-So “puts people before politics,” despite spending the previous five years voting exactly as instructed by whichever coastal consultant currently controls the party apparatus.
Meanwhile, Republicans see Nevada as one of their best opportunities to reclaim a Senate majority. With Democrats holding only a narrow edge, every competitive seat becomes a national obsession, and Nevada is attractive precisely because nobody here entirely trusts anybody.
On the Republican side, Sam Brown currently leads the field, with Jeff Gunter also seeking the nomination. Both gentlemen promise conservative principles, economic sanity, and devotion to Nevada interests, which are the standard ingredients of every Republican campaign speech since Calvin Coolidge was still warm.
Brown in particular presents Democrats with a challenge because he carries himself less like a career politician and more like a man who has actually endured hardship, a dangerous quality in modern campaigns where authenticity often disrupts prepared messaging.
And so the state braces itself for another election season.
There will be endless commercials, endless mailers, endless accusations that democracy itself hangs by a thread depending entirely upon whether suburban voters in Washoe County feel optimistic while purchasing gasoline.
Consultants will grow wealthy. Pollsters will contradict each other hourly. Cable news personalities who could not locate Ely on a map will suddenly speak gravely about “the Nevada pathway.”
And through it all, the ordinary voter will continue wondering why every candidate promises independence while voting almost exactly as expected once safely elected.
Still, perhaps Senator Rosen truly is bipartisan.
After all, in today’s political climate, merely speaking politely to someone from the opposite party is treated as an act requiring extraordinary courage, ceremonial awards, and at least three appearances on Sunday morning television.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment