China Throws a Tantrum
Well, color me shocked—China’s stomping its feet again because someone dared to push back. After President Trump finally slapped Beijing with the kind of tariffs that make actual noise—104 percent, not the mealy-mouthed “targeted levies” you get from the usual Beltway jellyfish—China did what it always does when it’s not getting its way: it threw a bureaucratic hissy fit, filed a WTO complaint (because globalist paper-pushers matter so much), and ratcheted up tariffs on American goods to 84 percent.
Let’s get down to brass tacks here: it isn’t diplomacy. It is hostage-taking, and the U.S. keeps handing over the ransom. China’s latest stunt includes adding 11 American companies to their “unreliable entities” list—because if anyone knows about unreliability, it’s a regime that still thinks “mutual respect” means “do what we say or else.” And, of course, rare earth mineral controls—because nothing says “responsible superpower” like throttling the supply chain to show who’s boss.
They’re even pretending they care about WTO rules. Cute. This, from the country that practically invented intellectual property theft and industrial espionage, whining about Phase 1 violations and the potential TikTok ban like it’s a moral outrage. Give me a break. If TikTok were a U.S. company hoovering Chinese youth data and beaming it to Langley, Beijing would’ve buried it six feet under a firewall years ago.
Meanwhile, here at home, the experts are clutching their pearls about inflation and recession as if we haven’t already been sold out to China for the last three decades by Wall Street and Washington’s bipartisan Chamber of Commerce fan club. Sure, tariffs might raise prices, but maybe it’s time Americans realized cheap toaster ovens and $5 t-shirts come at the cost of national security and dignity. If you want to be a serious country, you make things. You don’t outsource your backbone to a Communist dictatorship and cry about the consequences when you finally try to regrow a spine.
And don’t go thinking ByteDance is going to play ball, either. They’ve made it clear: no TikTok sale unless they get the whole enchilada—i.e., trade concessions, face-saving photo ops, and the U.S. on its knees. Trump gave them 75 more days to twist the knife a bit. But let’s not kid ourselves: these people don’t respect “equal treatment,” they respect power. And we’d better stop apologizing for using it.
Cortez Masto Continues to Gum Up the Works
Oh great, here we go again—Senator Catherine Cortez Masto is back with her Ruby Mountains Protection Act because Nevada doesn’t have enough federally protected land on the map. Heaven forbid we touch a square inch of soil if there’s even the slightest whiff of hydrocarbons under it.
The Ruby Mountains, mind you, are already part of a national forest and adjacent to a wildlife refuge, but that’s not enough. Now she wants to preemptively shut down any chance of oil and gas development in 450,000 acres of Nevada wilderness—because, you know, tourism might get a hangnail.
Meanwhile, in a rare stroke of common sense, the Bureau of Land Management greenlit the Pinyon Pipeline—a 16-mile, 24-inch-wide line to get natural gas from the Ruby Pipeline to the Valmy Power Plant. And guess what? The environmental review—yes, the very one the eco-zealots usually clutch their hemp necklaces over—found no significant impact. Shocking. Burying a pipe underground between two existing energy hubs without causing the Earth to implode. Imagine that.
The pipeline supports converting the North Valmy station from coal to natural gas. You’d think the green crowd would be celebrating—we’re making energy cleaner and more efficient. But no, we can’t have that. Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen are too busy whining about what a few tourists might think if someone dares put up a drill rig a hundred miles from the nearest Starbucks.
And as if that weren’t enough, Cortez Masto is also moonlighting as the self-appointed savior of Venezuela, dragging 18 other senators into her latest performative plea to bring back Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans. Because when the U.S. is groaning under a broken immigration system, and cities are drowning in budget deficits, clearly what we need is to extend TPS another 18 months for people who, and let’s be honest, aren’t going anywhere anyway. She wants the Trump administration—through Secretaries Marco Rubio and Kristi Noem, no less—to reverse a decision and pretend the Maduro regime is somehow less dangerous today than it’s been for the last decade.
Let’s call this what it is: political theater, plain and simple. Cortez Masto doesn’t care about gas pipelines, the Ruby Mountains, or even the Venezuelan people. She cares about looking good on MSNBC and fundraising off woke donors who think a solar panel on a shack counts as saving the planet.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are stuck paying $4 for gas, $300 for power bills, and listening to sermons about “climate justice” from people who couldn’t change a tire if their lives depended on it.
Lombardo Cracks Down While Democrats Keep Hiring Bureaucrats and Dodging Voters
Governor Joe Lombardo has dropped the Nevada Safe Streets and Neighborhoods Act—a much-needed reality check for the state’s spiraling crime problem. He stood shoulder to shoulder with law enforcement officials (you know, people who deal with criminals, not tweet about them) and laid out a plan to hit repeat offenders and fentanyl traffickers where it hurts: prison, for a long time.
The bill dares to lower the threshold for felony theft from $1,200 to $750—because, believe it or not, stealing a flat-screen shouldn’t be a slap on the wrist. It introduces mandatory minimums for fentanyl dealing–starting at 28 grams–and finally tells the hug-a-thug crowd that diversion programs aren’t for predators who target kids and old folk. It also tosses in long-overdue reforms to DUI, domestic violence, stalking, and bail policies while restoring a judge’s ability to peek at sealed records when someone’s trying to buy a gun. Shocking, right? Using common sense?
Of course, the ACLU of Nevada is crying about a $42 million prison cost like it’s a war crime. Here’s a thought: maybe it’s more expensive letting junkies and repeat thieves roam free. If the prisons are short-staffed, hire more staff. That’s what states are for—serving citizens, not coddling criminals.
We could also follow the laws already in the books, but that wouldn’t cost more money, and we can’t have that.
But don’t worry, while Lombardo tries to keep your family from being carjacked, Democrats are doing their part, too, by creating more state jobs for out-of-work federal paper-pushers. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager’s AB547 is a handout to every pink-slipped bureaucrat who used to shuffle memos at the VA or USPS. His “bold” idea? Let them skip the bachelor’s degree requirement and count their federal desk-jockeying as state experience, making it a jobs program for the alphabet soup crowd.
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 309 would make getting away with being a drugged-up menace behind the wheel harder. It drops the DUI threshold to 0.16 instead of 0.18, ups the fines, and tweaks the penalties for marijuana users—because if there’s one thing we need, it’s more reasons for the stoned-and-proud crowd to whine on Reddit.
And, let’s not forget Assembly Bill 530, which quietly rips power away from voters in Clark County by handing fuel tax decisions to the County Commission. Why let the public vote when you can raise taxes behind closed doors and call it “infrastructure investment.”
So, to sum up–Lombardo wants to lock up drug dealers, protect victims, and restore sanity to the justice system. Democrats want to hire ex-feds, loosen job requirements, raise taxes without asking you, and act surprised when crime doesn’t magically go away.
But hey, at least the paperwork will get filed faster.
Unions Buy the Legislature, Democrats Send the Receipt
Well, mark no one surprised—Big Labor dropped over $1.6 million on Nevada legislators during the 2024 election cycle, essentially buying themselves a reserved seat at the policymaking table. Yes, the unions are back with their wallets wide open, flooding Carson City with cash for their pet projects—like paid time off for everyone but the taxpayers footing the bill—get fast-tracked while the rest of us are left holding the tab.
Over 90% of that sweet, sweet union money went straight into Democrat pockets because nothing says “working-class hero,” like cutting deals in a backroom funded by the IBEW and AFSCME. The median donation to Democratic legislators was $25,800—chump change if you’re a union boss, but enough to turn your average Assembly member into a full-time lobbyist for the Brotherhood of Eternal Sick Days. Meanwhile, Republicans got a few scraps—just $6,500 on average—which tells you all you need to know about who’s playing ball and who’s to watch from the bleachers.
Top earners were the usual suspects: Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro and Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, each clocking over $100,000 in union “love.” But hey, I’m sure that’s not influencing any policy decisions. Nope, they just happened to care about film tax credits, permanent paid leave, and giving casino janitors more legal leverage than a small business owner trying to make payroll.
Special shoutout to Assemblywoman Linda Hunt, who made fourth place thanks to the Unite Here machine, the same group that wants to dictate cleaning schedules in private hotels as if every spilled cocktail is a constitutional crisis.
Despite backing a legislative slate with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, unions are crying crocodile tears because Governor Lombardo isn’t rolling over on every last demand—like forcing hotel owners to triple their cleaning crews or repealing Nevada’s lottery ban, which the gaming industry (read: their real bosses) isn’t thrilled about. Still, labor leaders say they’re “optimistic,” which is code for “we already paid for this legislation, now deliver.”
So, here’s your Nevada civics lesson for 2025: Labor unions write the checks, Democrats write the laws, and the rest of us write the checks to cover the fallout. Welcome to government by grievance, powered by overtime pay and taxpayer-funded political theater.
Ninth Circuit Bends Over Backward to Protect Bureaucrats from Hurt Feelings
In today’s episode of “The Constitution Is Optional,” the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—also known as California’s judicial daycare—unanimously tossed out a challenge to Nevada’s Election Worker Protection Act (SB406), a law so vague it makes it a felony to offend someone wearing a lanyard at your local gymnasium polling place.
Passed in 2023 with all the subtlety of a Soviet speech code, the law makes “harassment” or “intimidation” of election workers a crime punishable by up to four years in prison—because God forbid someone raises their voice when asking why their mail-in ballot magically turned into a provisional one.
The lawsuit, brought by a few brave (or possibly masochistic) former poll observers—including conservative donor Robert Beadles, who didn’t get the memo that free speech ends where bureaucratic feelings begin—argued that the law’s wording is so vague it criminalizes standing too close to a folding table. And they weren’t wrong. The law never really defines what counts as “intimidation” or even who exactly is an “election worker.” Is it the guy setting up cones outside the high school? Is it the volunteer refilling pens? Don’t ask too many questions—you might be a felon now.
As expected, the Ninth Circuit upheld the original dismissal, saying the plaintiffs had “no credible injury.” Translation: You ain’t arrested yet, so quit whining about the handcuffs waiting in the wings. According to this logic, a law could criminalize making eye contact with a ballot box, and it’d still be fine—as long as no one’s cuffed for it yet.
Naturally, Nevada’s Secretary of State’s Office is thrilled, calling the ruling a win for “democracy,” because nothing screams democratic values like turning citizens into criminals for observing an election with the wrong facial expression. The plaintiffs’ only remaining move is to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, assuming they can squeeze in a hearing between all the times the left screams about “threats to democracy” while actively criminalizing transparency.
So here we are: Speak too loudly at a polling place? That’s four years.
Burn a flag in the street? That’s performance art.
Welcome to Nevada, where feelings get a vote, and rights are redacted.
Feds Pull Plug on LGBTQ+ Alzheimer’s Grievance Studies—Academia Screeches in Mourning
Well, it finally happened—the federal government did something right for a change. UNLV’s very own activist-in-a-lab-coat, Professor Jason Flatt, just had his nearly $5 million taxpayer-funded pity party shut down by the National Institutes of Health, and he’s not taking it well. Flatt’s research into Alzheimer’s and the LGBTQ+ community—because dementia now has a sexual orientation—was deemed no longer a priority under the Trump administration. Cue the dramatic chest-clutching.
Flatt’s entire operation—years in the making—revolved around the idea that gay and transgender people with dementia need a different kind of science because, of course, the human brain works differently if your pronouns change with the weather. His research focused on “chosen families,” historical trauma, and—you guessed it—how being queer increases your risk of Alzheimer’s.
It’s less medical science and more sociology wrapped in a rainbow flag.
Despite receiving perfect scores from “scientific reviewers,” (read: peer reviewers probably more interested in being politically correct than medically accurate), the NIH and the Department of Defense finally got tired of playing along. They yanked two big-ticket grants—$3.5 million for caregiver sob stories and $1.4 million for LGBTQ+ veterans with dementia because nothing screams “national defense” like drag brunch support groups at memory care facilities.
Now, Flatt’s team of seven graduate assistants—probably all eagerly publishing “research” with footnotes from Tumblr—are out of work, and UNLV’s School of Public Health is scrambling for sympathy and private funding, which won’t come because no sane investor throws millions into a “queer memory project.”
Of course, Attorney General Aaron Ford jumped into action, filing a lawsuit claiming the cuts were “illegal.” Right—because if there’s one thing the Constitution guarantees, it’s federal funding for niche identity politics masquerading as health research. Activist groups like Silver State Equality are already howling that we’ve set LGBTQ+ health research back “years.” Maybe we’ve just stopped pretending that every grant application with a rainbow sticker deserves a blank check.
So now, Flatt’s “vital” work is stalled, the ivory tower’s sad, and taxpayers get a break for once. Because here’s the truth: dementia doesn’t care who you date, what pronouns you use, or which activist box you check. It’s a medical condition, not a social identity.
Maybe now we can go back to funding research based on biology—not ideology.
Watchdog Group Launches, Leftists Lose It Over Pickup Trucks and Accountability
Hell must’ve frozen over because Nevada just got something needed for decades: a watchdog with teeth. Enter DOGE NEVADA, a new third-party organization hell-bent on exposing waste, fraud, and abuse in the state’s bloated, mismanaged bureaucracy. Naturally, every grifter and paper-pushing parasite from Carson City to Clark County is probably sweating through their government-issued ergonomic desk chairs.
Brandon Davis, the group’s president, had the nerve to say that the public doesn’t trust government clowns to spend their money wisely. Shocking, right? The guy even called out the Department of Employment, Training, and Rehabilitation (DETR)—that shining temple of incompetence where Nevada tax dollars go to die.
Sheriff Kevin McMahill is urging DOGE to look, which tells you how bad things must be. When law enforcement says, “Please come clean up this mess,” you know the rot is genuine.
DOGE NEVADA plans to expand statewide and asks regular folks to blow the whistle on corruption via its website. Of course, expect bureaucrats and union reps to scream “witch hunt” any minute now because God forbid someone question their sacred ability to waste your money with impunity.
Now, shifting gears from public corruption to public lunacy—Cybertruck owners are under attack in Las Vegas, apparently because Elon Musk gives left-wing crybabies a rash. Christopher George, just a regular dude who bought a Tesla truck, woke up to the word “Nazi” and a swastika carved into the side of it. Classy. He just wanted to drive his spaceship-on-wheels in peace. But no, the woke mob decided scratching up his $100K ride was the answer to all their grief and tech daddy issues.
And he’s not alone. Another Cybertruck couple got aggressively tailgated, swerved at, screamed at, and racially harassed—all because they had the gall to own a futuristic pickup. What’s coming next, brick-throwing book clubs for Prius drivers who talk to Republicans?
It’s funny how the same crowd screeching about “tolerance” will vandalize your car and try to run you off the road because they don’t like who made it. These people think they’re fighting fascism with tire irons and spray paint. Newsflash: if you’re carving swastikas into vehicles because someone bought a product from a guy you don’t like, you’re not the good guy in this story.
So, to recap: DOGE NEVADA wants to expose fraud, and suddenly, half the state looks nervous. Meanwhile, Cybertruck drivers are becoming the new lepers in Woketopia. Welcome to Nevada in 2025—where truth is a threat, and a truck is a hate crime.
Paging Dr. Dolittle, Gone Missing
In today’s episode of “What the Hell Is Wrong with People?”, Las Vegas veterinarian Dr. Shawn Frehner pulled a Houdini after being caught on camera kicking a sedated horse during a procedure in Pahrump. That’s right—not just a horse, but a sedated one, meaning this tough guy picked a fight with a 1,200-pound animal that couldn’t even swat a fly.
The video, recorded by the horse’s owner, Shawna Gonzalez, quickly made the rounds. She says the abuse was so disturbing she had a seizure on the spot—because watching your vet treat your animal like a punching bag will do that.
Meanwhile, Frehner defended himself with the medical equivalent of, “I was just helping”—claiming he was “stimulating” the horse’s breathing. Uh-huh. And I suppose the next time you throw someone down the stairs, it’ll be to test their reflexes?
And this isn’t just a one-off.
There’s a whole barn full of complaints against Frehner, stretching back to prior disciplinary action for sloppy paperwork and improper drug handling. In other words, this guy has been riding the edge of professionalism for a while, and now the wheels have finally come off.
The Nevada Veterinary Board, in classic government form, is “aware” of the situation but can’t comment—because God forbid anyone take a public stand on an issue that involves kicking animals. Frehner, meanwhile, has disappeared like a guilty ex-boyfriend who “just needs time to think.” Multiple agencies are looking for him, which is nice, but don’t hold your breath. If he’s got half a brain, he’s gone to Idaho with a fake mustache and a burner phone.
Let’s be honest: anyone else caught kicking a drugged animal would be in handcuffs faster than you can say ‘PETA fundraiser,’ but since this guy has “Dr.” in front of his name, we’re all supposed to wait for “the process.” Screw that. Charge him, yank his license, and let him explain “stimulating breathing” to a judge with a low tolerance for bullshit.
Bottom line: a horse got kicked while unconscious, the guy responsible bolted, and everyone’s acting like this is some philosophical gray area. It’s not. It’s just cowardice in a white coat.
Storey County Deputy Nailed for Jailhouse Romp
Well, well, well—another cop taken down not for corruption, brutality, or excessive force but for sex. On April 6, 2025, Ian Alexander Nelson, a deputy at the Storey County Detention Facility, was fired and slapped with a sexual assault charge after allegedly getting too cozy with a female inmate. The whole thing blew open after an 11:15 p.m. report on April 5, prompting a lightning-fast investigation and a $100,000 bail.
Now, let’s ask the question nobody wants to touch with a ten-foot pole in today’s sanitized, outrage-obsessed society: was the sex consensual?
Because here’s the thing—if it was, then we’re not talking about assault. We’re talking about poor judgment, not a felony. Dumb, inappropriate, against department policy? Sure.
But let’s not pretend like this guy held someone down while she screamed. Because if this comes down to “he shouldn’t have done that because of the power dynamic,” but no actual force or coercion, then congratulations—you’ve just criminalized consensual sex with a moral purity test.
Let’s be honest: inmates aren’t saints, and deputies aren’t priests. It isn’t the first time something “inappropriate” happened behind bars, and it won’t be the last. But if a consenting adult decided she wanted to hook up with a deputy, do we need to call in the SWAT team and ruin a man’s life over it? Or was it only a problem after she had second thoughts—or saw an opportunity?
Meanwhile, just down the hill in Lyon County, we’ve got a pack of storage unit burglars ransacking half the county, pawning loot in Sparks, and facing charges for real crimes. Four men—Jerady Smith, Joseph Davis, Christian Cox, and Lawrence Grimes—were picked up for everything from grand larceny to drug possession to gun charges. Yeah, actual felonies, actual victims, and no doubt about it.
So let me get this straight: burglars caught with stolen goods and illegal weapons get quietly booked and shuffled into the jail system, but a deputy who may or may not have had consensual sex gets publicly crucified like Jeffrey Dahmer. Priorities, anyone?
We’ll see how this shakes out. If Nelson forced himself on someone, throw the book at him. But if this turns out to be a case of post-coital regret dressed up as felony assault, then this isn’t justice—it’s witch-hunting.