Following up on a news story, reported here about license sex worker, Alice Little and her uphill battle to regain the right to work from a legal brothel in Nevada, she has opened a GoFundMe campaign called, “Legal Defense Fund for Nevada Brothels” to help raise money in her ongoing lawsuit against Nevada’s governor for his refusal to reopen brothels amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

With her legal costs soaring, Alice Little, who works at Moonlite Bunny Ranch in Lyon County, one of eight Nevada counties that allow for legalized prostitution and is home to four brothels, has turned to the online fundraising platform in her ongoing legal battle.

To date, Little’s lawsuit has been entirely self-funded, but after eight months of underemployment and financial hardship caused by the brothel closures and Nevada’s depressed COVID economy, Little is seeking assistance with her ever-increasing legal fees as she continues her fight.

“Since the brothels closed, sex workers have been financially devastated,” said Little. “We’ve been scrambling to make ends meet.

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak shut down the state’s legal bordellos in March because of COVID-19, denying individuals such as Little to earn an honest wage. The outspoken Little claims in her lawsuit that the governor’s “arbitrary and capricious” decision to keep legal brothels closed is in violation of her rights.

The governor has yet to reopen the state’s legal brothels, even though other close-contact businesses such as massage parlors, spas and salons have been given the green light. Little wants the governor to immediately reopen Nevada’s legal brothels or allow sex workers to lawfully work from home.

On Nov. 19, the court ordered the Office of the Nevada Attorney General to respond to Little’s legal action within 30 days.

“Some sex workers, including me, have pivoted to making some money through adult online platforms like OnlyFans, which commonly isn’t as lucrative as legal brothel work,” Little said. “Other sex workers have had no choice but to practice prostitution illegally in Las Vegas and Reno, where prostitution is criminalized, without the safety and health measures the legal brothels provide. It’s really a disaster.”

“I’ve already spent a considerable amount of my personal savings on this lawsuit,” she added. “After speaking with other unemployed brothel workers, I was encouraged to start a GoFundMe to help with our ‘David versus Goliath’ legal battle against the governor.”

“So far, the response has been overwhelmingly positive as fellow sex workers, sex worker clients and other generous individuals have started to donate,” said Little. “It’s extremely heartwarming and inspiring to know that Nevada’s sex workers have support in these uncertain times.”

Marc Randazza, Little’s attorney, said that government leaders are using the pandemic as an excuse to keep these businesses closed.

“There are constitutional rights at stake. Our democratically elected leaders are acting in undemocratic ways,” Randazza said.

According to the lawsuit, the closure of the brothels violates constitutional rights:

• The freedom of association, which protects an individual’s right to enter into and maintain an intimate relationship from unjustified government interference
• The right to earn a living, which protects individual rights to earn a living through their chosen career from unjustified government interference
• The right to equal protection. The lawsuit claims that Sisolak arbitrarily prohibited Little from working in the legal sex industry when other businesses that involve direct contact with clients are allowed to open.

Sisolak’s office declined to comment. Little’s GoFundMe page can be found at gofundme.com/f/legal-defense-fund-for-nevada-brothels.

My Cousin Elmo says, “According to our government, deviation from the norm shall be punishable by law unless they can exploit it.”

First there was Senator Dianne Feinstein and her Chinese spy/chauffeur in 2018. Then earlier in 2020, we learned about former-Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter’s connection to the Chinese Communist Party.

Then last week it was discovered that Congressmen Eric Stalwell had literally been in bed with the Chinese spy ring. Could it be that all this will open a new can-of-worms and come back to bite one retired Nevada senator in the ass?

One can only pray…

It’s been six-years now since the peaceable standoff at the Bundy Ranch near Las Vegas. And while the dust has yet to fully settle on the piece of property and the history leading up to, through and after the unconstitutional attempt of land grabbing and civil rights take over, one thing has become clearer: Harry Reid and his son, Rory, were both deeply involved in a deal with the Chinese-owned ENN Energy Group to build a $5 billion solar farm in Laughlin, Nevada, and they must be investigated for espionage and treason.

In fact, I first pointed to this collaboration in 2012, writing here: https://wp.me/p4PKVa-4lm. Less than two years later, I followed it up with this article: https://wp.me/p4PKVa-857. Reid was also involved in the Chinese-backed, California-based Faraday Future as noted here: https://wp.me/p4PKVa-9Wx.

Now I understand why Reid skated on everything he had his greasy fingers in and how he grew so filthy-rich during his time in Washington D.C. It’s called a ‘cabal,’ and in this case it not only was aimed to undermine the sovereignty of the U.S., but to enrich those involved in these questionable acts against this nation, her citizens, and the U.S. Constitution.

Vindication.

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants,” President Thomas Jefferson wrote in a 1787 letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams.

Had the third U.S. President been a Nevada citizen and written this now famous and oft-quoted sentence on Facebook in 2020, he would be facing possible criminal misdemeanor charges.

That’s what Clark County resident Steve Feeder, 60, is looking at after having called Gov. Steve Sisolak a ‘tyrant,’ in a May 19 Facebook post, stating, “In any WAR which we are now in sheep will be casualties but we must March on.”

He was speaking of Sisolak’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis.

Feeders comment, and 30-plus others like them are now considered, “inciting breach of peace,” by Las Vegas Township Judge Karen Bennett-Haron, who ruled in October that his postings meet the “minimal evidentiary standard” for a crime.

But then Vegas is no stranger to judges that venture off the Constitutional rail. Federal Judge Gloria Navarro decided to do everything she could to help the Bureau of Land Management, et. al., in its then-Senator Harry Reid’s illegal 2014 land snatch from the Bundy Ranch and the ensuing armed standoff, including violating the oath of her office as well as the defendant’s civil liberties..

The Nevada Attorney’s General office said that usually decline to bring charges on social media only related threats directed at public officials due to the First Amendment, but that Feeder’s comments were specific enough to warrant criminal charges.

“If you count all the threats, there’s 34 of the exact same threats pasted on Governor Sisolak’s page, which is open to the public for any crazy person to read it and act on it regardless of whether the defendant intended for somebody to act on it,” Deputy Attorney General Michael Kovac said. “The fact that he’s posting that to Governor Sisolak’s page shows a subjective intent to terrorize the governor. There’s no other reason for him to post it there.”

Feeder was offered a plea deal which would have entailed a guilty plea to a single misdemeanor, a promise to stay out of trouble for six months, a $1,000 fine and a 120-day suspended sentence. Feeder refused and pleaded not guilty to all charges.

A jury trial is set for June 2021.

Jay Maynard, Feeder’s attorney, noted that state prosecutors presented no evidence that Feeder had purchased a gun, planned a trip to Carson City, attempted to directly contact Sisolak or had done anything beyond posting comments.

“He was upset. Absolutely. He used some very pointed language. Absolutely. But he was protesting the fact that we had been in a quarantine for, as he put it at the time, 60 days, and that is well within his First Amendment right,” Maynard said. “Indeed, to be able to complain to our government is the most essential of the First Amendment rights. Political speech is protected beyond any other form of speech. It is sacrosanct and it is absolutely essential to the proper functioning of our democracy.”

Initially, Feeder was charged with three crimes, including: Interfering with a public officer, a gross misdemeanor; publishing matter inciting breach of peace or other crimes, also a gross misdemeanor; and provoking commission of breach of peace, a misdemeanor. Bennett-Haron decided that prosecutors had met the necessary standard on “publishing matter inciting breach of peace.”

Nevada Department of Public Safety Investigator Colter Earl testified that he began looking into the case after receiving a complaint from the state’s Dignitary Protection Detail (DPD) regarding “threats” made against Sisolak by Feeder on his Facebook page.

Earl said that he spoke with Feeder in May 2020 at Feeder’s home, where he admitted to posting the comments on Sisolak’s Facebook page.

“His response was that his wife called him an idiot and that when I had showed up at his house that I was there for his rant,” Earl said, according to a court transcript. “He described himself basically as very angry and upset regarding the State’s action in the COVID-19 response.”

Earl stated that his division doesn’t have a “rule book” determining when it was appropriate to investigate or bring charges related to social media threats. He did say that it was the DPD that pointed to other comments left by Feeder, including calls for “civil disobedience,” telling the governor that “your [sic] the CANCER and your slow painful passing will be the cure” and saying that a family friend had prayed for “death to the tyrant and his family.”

While acknowledging that Feeder hadn’t taken any direct action beyond the Facebook posts, Kovac wrote in a court filing that making the threats in a “popular, public online forum amplifies the fear that Defendant (Feeder) might find a receptive audience of like-minded individuals willing to carry out such threats.”

Kovac cited the arrest of three alleged members of the “Boogaloo” extremist movement and the resignation of the state’s former Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation Director Heather Korbulic over threats made to her safety after less than two months on the job.

Korbulic was not physically attacked or harmed by anyone, extremist or otherwise, during her brief tenure.

“It is an environment on edge, filled with angry, impulsive, and dangerous nutcases, many of whom are armed and appear ready to take action,” Kovac claimed. “It takes only one of these nutcases to be moved by one of these exhortations and decide to cross the oftentimes fine line separating vitriol from violence.”

Maynard said that the First Amendment is the benchmark in this case.

“Crazy people aren’t the standard,” Maynard said. “The speaker has to know that his audience is receptive to an immediate calling. We don’t see that anywhere.”

As Jefferson wrote, also in that same letter to Smith: “The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves.”

It becomes easy to see the state administration (British ministry,) the media (gazetteers,) the state and federal judges (ministers,) and ourselves wrapped up in this much overlooked potion of Jefferson’s commentary.

Jefferson also hoped it wouldn’t take 20 years.

My Cousin Elmo says, “More than once I said, ‘Screw the Chinese Communists.’ Little did I know that Congressman Stalwell was listening.”

It’s been a struggle to write anything meaningful today. I’ve been busy depressing myself with Nevada news articles that deal with little more than either the election or COVID-19.

The more I learn, the more I want to unlearn. Unfortunately, it is my job to know as much as I can before sitting down to write a thoughtful word about any of it.

Plus, I’ve been avoiding social media and those person’s I call ‘trolls,’ who continue to plague my various feeds with hate-filled messages and rants. My list of blocked commenters is growing by leaps and bounds.

The pervasive belief is that I’m some sort of hack, that I lack ethics in my reporting and style. My answer to that has been and remains, “My only ethical standard when reporting the news is the truth.”

Many of these people don’t realize that I’ve been down this road before. In 2006, I was the subject of a “journalism ethics round table,” at UNR, where I was blasted both professionally and as a person for having a personal blog on a public forum while working as a newspaper reporter.

Ha! Ethics my ass. I wasn’t even invited to attend or defend myself, not that it would have done any good.

That aside, I have a touch of ‘house cleaning’ to do regarding the Washoe County Voter Registration dump I received yesterday. After only two-minutes of online research I learned that the supposed-dump came from the website, ‘Geller Report.’

I got so carried away thinking I had some sort of exclusive, that I forgot to complete some ‘due diligence,’ on my part.

Anyway, I am desirous of returning to my old renegade way of news reporting, but that’s jus’ me talking as these ‘trolls’ have me all fired up. And that’s the truth.

Someone dumped a bunch of voter registration numbers for Washoe County, Nevada, the county that I live in, in my lap…

Sources:

https:// http://www. washoecounty.us/voters/files/20_general_ab_ev_files/[File_Name_Goes_Here]

**Note: [File_Name_Goes_Here] = one of the file names mentioned below

File Types and Names:

General Election Voter registration Files:

ab_ev_file_MM_DD_YY.xls

These are daily general election voter registration and ballot files for that date.

The files will show the date and time they were created when downloaded and will also show who they were last saved by.

ab_ev_file_10_12_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_14_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_15_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_16_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_17_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_18_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_19_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_20_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_21_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_22_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_23_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_24_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_25_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_26_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_27_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_28_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_29_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_29_20.update.xlsx
ab_ev_file_10_30_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_2_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_5_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_6_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_7_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_8_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_9_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_10_20.xlsx
ab_ev_file_11_11_20.xlsx

Inactive Voter Files:

These are the lists of inactive voters by date.

inactive_voters_9_17_20.xlsx
inactive_voters_9_19_20.xlsx
inactive_voters_9_24_20.xlsx
inactive_voters_10_1_20.xlsx
inactive_voters_10_22_20.xlsx

Primary Election Voter File:  This is the registered voters for the primary election dated 21 May 2020.

av_multi_file_5_21_20.xlsx

Test Summaries:

Voters that voted in the Primary Election who where moved to inactive voters:

(This is derived from using Washoe county file ‘av_multi_file_5_21_20’ crossed to ‘inactive_voters_10_1_20’)

A total of 12,476 registered voters removed; of the 12,476 registered voters removed 10,562 of them were challenged ballots in the primary election.  IN the general election 1,452 (11.64%) of the voters removed were added back.  Then of those added back 1,452 voters added back 1,188 (81.81%) were challenged votes in the primary election.

New Registered Voters by Date:

This looks at the net number of voters registered on a date using the file ab_ev_file_11_9_20.xlsx (test was done on 10 November 2020).  I closed the gap to go from 01 January 2017 forward.  (Note: It there is also another date anomaly in 1 January 1991 )

There are 24 days where the daily new registered voters were over 3 Standard Deviations (up to 10 standard deviations).

In those 24 days, 23,201 voters were registered of which 18,381 voted. So that is 7.77% of the votes cast.  Of those registered voters 7,477 were 50 or older.

Additionally, the county is using an inconsistent method to add inactive voters back to the registered voters.  What I mean is in some cases the voter registration date stays the same and in some cases they change the to a different date (No clear rhyme or reason for this).

Voter Registration date to ballot received:

This is just looking at the date the individual was added to the voter registration file data set to the date they registered to vote and to the date their ballot was received.

File Used: ab_ev_file_11_9_20.xlsx

Then there are 2,038 voters that were entered into the ‘system’ prior to their registration date.  OF the 2,038 voters 422 (20.71%) of them had ballots received and counted prior to being registered to vote.

Duplicate Voters:

This looked for duplicate voters in the list by voter ID number.  File used: ab_ev_file_11_9_20.xlsx was used.

In that file you will see 7,637 duplicate votes (based on Voter ID Number):

3,757 ‘people’ voted 2 Times
40 ‘people’ Voted 3 Times
1 ‘person’ voted 4 times

Non Verified Voters or Votes:

File used: ab_ev_file_11_11_20.xlsx

In this file 236,452 votes showing as received.  Of the 236,452 votes 130,398 (55.15%) are classified as verified and 106,054 (44.85%) are classified as not verified.

General Election Voter File changes by date:

This looks at changes in the daily file to see what was in a previous date file and not in a prior date file.

Files Used: ab_ev_file_10_12_20.xlsx forward three days to the end

File 1	File 1 Records	File 2	File 2 Records	Voters In File 1 and Not File 2	Ballots in File 1 and Not File 2
14-Oct-20	296,375	17-Oct-20	298,779	244	37
17-Oct-20	298,779	20-Oct-20	299,262	108	19
20-Oct-20	299,262	22-Oct-20	299,692	118	30
22-Oct-20	299,692	25-Oct-20	300,796	127	27
25-Oct-20	300,796	28-Oct-20	302,169	104	21
28-Oct-20	302,169	2-Nov-20	303,959	148	30
2-Nov-20	303,959	5-Nov-20	303,988	29	8
5-Nov-20	303,988	8-Nov-20	303,745	269	40
8-Nov-20	303,745	11-Nov-20	303,679	81	38
				1,228	250

Net minimum number of voters added: 8,532  [7,304 from file record changes + 1,228 from dropped records]

Ballots cast that vanished: 250 (This is also the minimum number)

Other Odd items:

File used: ab_ev_file_11_11_20.xlsx

There are three ‘people’ that are 120 years old that voted: ( 1.ASTELLANOS-RAMIREZ, DARLA MARY / 2. SHAMIM, ZOAYLA NAIMA / 3. PUSZKIEWICZ, HUNTER RENEE)

Multi County Registered Voters:

File used: ab_ev_file_11_11_20.xlsx, Clark County Voter Registration Files from their website, Elko County Voter Files from their website.

Elko and Washoe County have an fairly easy to identify 40 or so individuals that are registered to vote in both counties.

Washoe and Clark County have a large number that need to be looked into.  From a first name, middle name, last name, and birthdate/year cross there are 478.  Some of these have the same addresses listed but flipped.

The Affidavit field for registered voters is not done in a constant manner.  (file: ab_ev_file_11_11_20.xlsx) There are multiple people that have the same affidavit number.  That number should the form of ID used to register and some type of serial number.

Also regarding the affidavit, there are people using a federal form used for military voters to vote when those individuals are clearly not in the military (out of state voters; and in some cases in state voters).

Why is the birthplace in this file not being consistently used?  Example: 36,126 registered voters that cast ballots in the general election. So Washoe county doesn’t even know where they were born.

Logic Test:

This is just the logic test as to why the above is important.

The last time I checked the news is saying:
Biden: 126,098
Trump: 114,614
Total Votes: 240,712

(Source: Politico 2020 Election Results for NV; 09 NOV 20)

File ‘ab_ev_file_11_9_20.xlsx’ was showing a total of 236,473 Ballots Received. What that means is they are counting duplicate voters in those numbers and they are counting contested ballots in those numbers and they are counting unregistered voters in those numbers.

Votes cast: 236,473

Duplicate Votes <7,637>

Challenged Votes <13,275>  * Note: Up to because some of the duplicate votes were caught as challenged.

Other min County duplicates <500> *note just rounding

Removed after primary vote challenge <1,188>  This one should have everyone scratching their head

Added prior to registering  <2,037>

Net first glance Questionable <24,638>  (10.42% of 236,473)

(Note: Politico is showing a 11,368 vote spread…. So those are over twice the number of the spread)

Votes after questionable: 211,835 with 10.42% highly suspicious

This does not even include the magical numbers of records that just appear in this file on the same second.

This does not include the number of voters that are using the same phone number or same addresses.  The out of proportion batch processing of ballots where there are groups that have an average age of 72.

Someone needs to be looking at the data and questioning it.  They need to be pulling those ballots and looking with their own eyes.

If the country knew the above, what do you think they would believe?  Do you think that they would have any faith in the system with the data literally showing the news and the county counting all votes as being valid.

Final Washoe Election Results…https://gis.washoecounty.us/agolHost?id=ElecGEN2020

Those duplicate votes are counted and have been counted this whole time… to included the invalidated votes and the invalidated challenged votes.

Everything above literally says this is a systemic issue.  You can literally recreate everything using the referenced data listed.

As a resident of Nevada and a news reporter, I feel as if I’m the only one digging down to find the truth. There is so much that isn’t being covered by either the National media or our local media. Look what 10 or 15 minutes of online research has yielded.

From Nevada’s own state election site: Total Ballots Cast: 1,327,394

Source: https://www.nvsos.Gov/sos/home/showdocument?id=9054

Total Presidential Election Votes: 1,405,376

Source: https://silverstateelection.nv.Gov/USPresidential/#race1

There are 77,982 more votes in the Presidential election than there are casted ballots in Nevada. And yet the Nevada Supreme Court rejected Trump challenge and is allowing the election certification to stand.

While the national media decries, ‘wide-spread voter fraud,’ and presses the issue that President Trump is a sore loser and former Vice-president Biden is the President-elect, only six places: Clark County, NV, Maricopa County, AZ, Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia, were actually targeted for election fraud on Nov. 3, 2020.

Setting that aside, documentation shows how Dominion provided administrators with privileges that include bypassing security measures; affidavits describing voters’ and workers’ experiences, and statistical data like strings of thousands of sequential Biden votes occurring with quadrillion-to-1 improbability, ballot processing velocity spikes that are physically impossible for the equipment and that coincide with windows of intimidation/interference with observers. Also there is the fact that in each of several swing states Biden achieved a come-from-behind victory with a margin in the tens-of-thousands of votes.

Further, Dominion’s network attached storage (NAS) servers are knowingly infected with QSnatch malware, which allows for the misappropriation of an administrator’s credentials once they’ve logged-in. So, not only can administrators override, with no audit trail, election security in a precinct, so can anyone who steals those credentials.

And if this weren’t enough, Dominion sends out software patches that continuously and deliberately allows QSnatch to beat their patches. This according to an article published by several business technology news sites in July 2020.

The United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) posted alerts in July that attacks using the QSnatch malware, also tracked under the name of Derek, had been traced back to 2014. The alert goes on to say that these attacks had intensified between Oct. 2019 and mid-June 2020, while the number of reported infections grew to about 7,600 devices.

This may be the deeper reason why Christopher Krebs, the agency’s first director, was fired in November.

QSnatch comes with a CGI password logger, which installs a fake version of the device admin login page, logging successful authentications and passing them to the legitimate login page; a Credential scraper; an SSH backdoor, allowing for the input of arbitrary code; Exfiltration, that steals files, including system configurations and log files, which are encrypted with the attackers public key, then sent to the attacker’s infrastructure over HTTPS; and a web shell functionality for remote access. Once the attacker gains a foothold, the QSnatch malware is injected into the NAS firmware and takes full control of the device, blocking future updates to the firmware, including patching the infection.

These were all ‘knowns,’ but never properly addressed.

With Nevada one of eight states, plus the District of Columbia, that conducted its election via a universal absentee ballot system, meaning that every registered voter was sent a ballot whether or not it was requested, the Republicans claim the state received eight-and-a-half times the number of votes as it did in the 2016 election, while Clark County received 10 times more ballots.

But why? Here’s what the media isn’t telling anyone…

Clark relies on a ballot sorting system with an inadequate signature verification process that failed 89% of the time and was discovered to be the top reason mail-in ballots were rejected in 2016. That ballot sorting machine is called Agilis.

According to their own website: “The Agilis provides election officials the ability to sort their own mail ballot packets and verify voter signatures with complete accuracy and a full audit trail inside their own secure facility. The Agilis eliminates the movement of ballots around an office so all nontabulated ballots remain in a secure location during sorting and signature verification.”

Earlier this year, Clark County officials announced that they would need to lower the recommended factory tolerance settings on the Agilis machine in order to capture the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles’ signature used to verify mail-in ballots. To match a ballot signature, the Agilis machine requires a clear signature on file with election officials scanned at a minimum resolution of 200 dots per inch.

However, the bulk of Clark County’s signature files come from the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles which doesn’t even have the capability of scanning signatures at that resolution. Knowing this, Clark County election officials still went ahead and lowered the signature match threshold, rendering the system nearly useless.

Amid this, Clark County also saw a huge spike in ‘problem’ voter registrations during the 2020 Presidential election cycle.

Analysis of voting records show that during the 2016 Presidential election, there were only 68 voter registrations missing critical data. That number jump to 13,372 this year, with 74 percent of the errors occurring between July and September.

Finally, there were more than 13 thousand voters whose registration information contained no sex or date of birth, or who had listed their residence or mailing address as a temporary RV park or a casino. This mean that there is no way to track these people or to know if any of these voters were of legal age to cast a ballot or even if they were legal residents of Nevada.