Blog

Justin walked into the bar, exuding an old-world charm in his 1930s-styled suit, a guitar case in hand. His intellect was a quiet storm, with an IQ of 190, surpassing even that of Einstein.

“There is nothing better than listening to a quantum physics podcast on a Friday afternoon,” he announced with a casual grin.

The bar patrons glanced at him before resuming their drinks and conversations.

An Army vet living off a disability check, Justin constantly sought ways to fill his time. This week, he decided to entertain the Friday night crowd with his singing and guitar playing.

Two years ago, shortly after his second tour in Afghanistan, Justin had hit rock bottom. PTSD had taken a heavy toll, and in his darkest moment, he attempted to end his life. Surviving the attempt and 13 days in a coma, however, brought a renewed vigor to his existence.

Tonight, he would prove his mettle once again. As he set up the stage and plugged in his guitar, the room heard a near-flawless sound check hinting at the magic to come.

He joined me at the bar, ordering a beer. “Tonight is gonna be a Robert Johnson sorta night,” he said, raising his bottle in a toast. We clinked bottles and took a hearty swig.

Before we knew it, it was time for Justin to take the stage.

“Break a leg,” I offered.

“Oh, I’m gonna do more than that,” he replied with a smile.

The bar had filled, and a hum of chatter filled the room. Justin adjusted the microphone, tapped it twice, and strummed a few chords. The sound was clear and resonant, instantly capturing the attention of everyone in earshot.

“Good evening, everyone,” Justin began, his voice strong and steady.

“Tonight, we’re going on a journey back to the crossroads, where Robert Johnson made a deal with the devil to become the greatest blues guitarist of all time. Hope y’all are ready for some blues.”

He launched into “Cross Road Blues,” his fingers dancing over the strings with precision and passion. The room fell silent, the audience captivated by Justin’s performance.

As he played, the air around him began to shimmer in an unsettling way. A soft, eerie glow emanated from his body, growing brighter and more intense. Suddenly, Justin became engulfed in flames, their unnatural violet hue casting an eerie glow over the room.

Gasps of fear rippled through the audience. The patrons exchanged uneasy glances, some stepping back, unsure of what they were witnessing.

But Justin played on, seemingly unfazed by the fire that surrounded him. His eyes were closed, his expression one of pure concentration and passion.

The initial fear began to give way to a strange fascination. The flames danced and flickered, casting long, wavering shadows on the walls.

As Justin finished the first song, the flames slowly began to subside, and the bar erupted in hesitant applause, the tension palpable.

Justin opened his eyes and smiled. He took a moment to catch his breath, then leaned into the microphone.

“Thank you, everyone. This next one is a little something I wrote myself. It’s about finding your soul in the darkest of places.”

As he began to play again, the flames reappeared, even more vibrant and dynamic, their glow sinister and otherworldly. The following two hours flew by in a rythme of four-four time.

After his final song, the applause came, still tinged with an undercurrent of unease. The fire around Justin flickered one last time before vanishing completely, leaving him unharmed.

He returned to the bar.

“Man, that was incredible,” I said, handing him another beer.

“Thanks,” Justin replied, a satisfied smile on his face. “It’s amazing how music can heal, isn’t it?”

I nodded, though a shiver ran down my spine. “Yeah, it really is. You have a gift, Justin. Don’t ever forget that.”

We sat in uncomfortable silence, sipping our beers and soaking in the still-vibrating atmosphere. The night was still young, but I knew that what Justin had shared tonight would linger in the minds of everyone who heard it, a haunting memory.

As the bar slowly returned to its usual buzz of conversations and laughter, I noticed a thin, dark man sitting close by, his eyes fixed on Justin. Something was unsettling about him, a shadow that seemed to follow him even in the dim light. Justin never introduced me to the man, who disappeared without a trace a few minutes later.

Justin looked at me and said, “You know, I think I’m finally starting to find my place in this world again.”

I smiled and raised my bottle, knowing nothing was strange about his performance, as it was natural to Virginia City. “Here is to finding our place, no matter how long it takes.”

We clinked bottles again, taking another drink.

American Independence was not a war over high taxes. The struggle for our Independence was because the British government was violating multiple rights of the American colonists that they were entitled to through over 600 years of English Constitutionalism.

The British government denied the American colonists the right to legislation through representation, freedom from unlawful searches and seizures, due process, defense of property, and the right to keep and bear arms. American colonists protested the British government’s unconstitutional exercise of power for over 55 years before declaring Independence.

American colonists never started a war against the British government. The British government picked up arms against their colonists, and we, by right, defended our life, liberty, and property from those in government.

The government of Great Britain did not just “let the Americans have independence.” We defeated their efforts to keep us colonized not only once but twice, the first time in 1783 and finally in 1815.

Our Independence from Great Britain became final on July 2, 1776, with the ratification of the Lee Resolution by the Continental Congress. On this date, we formed 13 free and independent Countries (States.)

Don’t let your Country (State) be recolonized by lies from big government and globalist federal supremacists, making you subject to the “rulers” in Washington, D.C.

Texas Representative Maxine Waters presented her latest conspiracy theory during an MSNBC appearance on Sunday, June 23.

“I’m very concerned, not only about my safety and not only about the safety of members of Congress,” Waters said. “I’m concerned about the safety of so many people in this country, particularly people of color. Donald Trump has said that if he does not win, it is going to be fraud, and because it is going to be fraud, there will be blood in the streets. He threatens about a civil war, and he threatens there’s going to be violence.”

She is not good at it like I am.

In the wake of President Trump signing Executive Order 13825 on Thursday, March 1, 2018, which clarified the use of civilian courts and lawyers to assist Military Tribunals, a secretive wave of activity has unfolded in the United States.

Tribunals have been operational since the start of 2019, leading to the appearance of numerous doubles among politicians, royalty, and celebrities. These doubles, often utilized after the demise or arrest of the original, have become common. The public frequently notices a change in appearance following a brief absence, although advanced rubber masks have made detection difficult.

The clandestine nature of the Junta running the US government has kept the public in the dark about many high-profile arrests and executions.

Hillary Clinton, for example, has been under house arrest since January 2017 following a Court Martial for her involvement in the Clinton Foundation crimes. Her public appearances, often marked by the infamous ankle boot, have been attributed to a plea deal that required her cooperation in exposing the crimes of the Cabal.

John McCain suddenly switching his ankle boot from one foot to the other further fueled speculation about the authenticity of such narratives. Eventually, Clinton and McCain faced execution for their involvement with ISIS, an act falling under military jurisdiction due to its nature of treason.

Hillary Clinton had the chance to serve the Junta by making public appearances to awaken people to her crimes. However, her health issues limited her visibility.

Her execution came after her remarks about a potential 2020 run during appearances on the Graham Norton Show and the Stern program in December 2019. She has since been replaced by a double.

Barack Obama was executed for treason due to his actions as a shadow President post-2016 election, with John Kerry acting as his emissary. The public first noticed his double in 2017, as did I, marked by the lack of a fleshy lower lip, and later corrected before his execution. Michelle Obama now serves as a double White Hat (“white hat” Trump supporter as opposed to a “black hat” in league with the deep state.)

Joe Biden, plagued by dementia, was replaced by a double Black Hat during his campaign and later a double White Hat.

The practice of deploying doubles extends to many influential figures.

John Kerry, who attempted to run a shadow government post-Trump election, was caught and executed after revealing his alliances through a hasty visit to Antarctica. The Joe Biden double was introduced years ago by Obama and his handlers due to Biden being susceptible to blackmail over his pedophile tendencies.

Bill Clinton’s appearance at a DNC event in Fall 2019 fueled speculation, given his reported terminal AIDS diagnosis and the ongoing scrutiny of the Clinton Foundation for money laundering and political corruption. Similarly, Ruth Bader Ginsburg became a double after trading her SCOTUS vote for political favors, and Kamala Harris’s prosecutorial corruption warranted her replacement. Maxine Waters, despite her public cries to “impeach 45,” was implicated in financial misconduct, hiding stolen funds through front companies.

The 2016 election brought a slew of coup attempts against President Trump, led by Nancy Pelosi and aided by Soros’s bribes. Former Vice President Mike Pence, driven by ambition, and Jared Kushner, who accepted a bribe, were replaced by lookalikes after their failed coup attempts. Adam Schiff, arrested in November 2019, also fell into this category, having participated in multiple coup attempts.

Some notable figures, such as George Soros and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, were replaced by doubles after natural deaths to maintain their influence. It was also the case for Pope Francis, who was replaced by a Black Hat double following his assassination by the Vatican. Public figures like Boris Johnson and Justin Trudeau, implicated in crimes ranging from treason to public fund theft, have similarly been replaced.

The Tribunals have also targeted Satanism and child sacrifice, deeply embedded within European royalty and the US political elite, including figures like John Podesta and Marina Abramovic. The prosecution of these individuals, often shielded from the public eye, has led to doubles among many celebrities and political figures.

The UK’s Royal Family has been decimated by these Tribunals, with Queen Elizabeth II executed for child sacrifice and her family members, and Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and Prince Charles replaced. The use of doubles has also extended to those involved in the controversial Covid-19 vaccination programs, with Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci being notable examples.

The Tribunals have addressed various forms of treason and insurrection, resulting in the replacement of key figures like James Comey, John Brennan, and Lindsey Graham with doubles. Mark Zuckerberg was arrested for insurrection and sedition, as was Don Lemon of CNN.

Foreign influence on US politics has led to the detention and replacement of members of “The Squad” at Gitmo. The Judiciary Committee, led by Lindsey Graham, has been scrutinized for its role in the DOJ’s exposure of 2016 election crimes, resulting in Graham’s arrest.

These notes have come from various sources on the Internet since 2017. I did not distinguish between sources and have refused to acknowledge or give credit to those sources. And while this article may seem plausible, it is entirely fictional until proven otherwise.

Northern Nevada is on the brink of a massive energy transformation as the data storage industry grows.

NV Energy President and CEO Doug Cannon has projected that energy usage in the region could double within the next decade. Currently, the area’s daily energy load is around 2,000 megawatts, but with new contracts signed with data centers, the goal is to increase this figure to 4,000 megawatts in just eight years.

“This growth represents a monumental investment and expansion,” remarked Cannon in a recent interview on Nevada Newsmakers with Sam Shad. “We’re focused on collaborating with regulators to ensure we can build the necessary infrastructure to support this demand.”

The appeal of Northern Nevada to data center giants like Switch, Apple, eBay, and Google lies in its dry climate, ample land availability, and secure desert locations, which experts cite as pivotal factors driving industry growth. Additionally, the region’s favorable business and tax environment, coupled with significantly lower energy costs compared to neighboring California, positions it as a prime destination for such substantial investments.

“Proximity to fiber routes along Interstate 80 and rapid data transmission times to the Bay Area further enhance Northern Nevada’s appeal,” noted Grant van Rooyen, CEO of Tract, a key player in local data center development.

Beyond economic benefits, the industry promises well-paying jobs, with salaries for data center technicians ranging from $60,000 to $90,000 annually. State leaders are promoting these opportunities, underscoring the sector’s potential to bolster Nevada’s economy.

As energy demands escalate, NV Energy is accelerating its transition towards sustainable practices, moving away from fossil fuels to embrace natural gas and renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and battery power. The Sierra Solar project, a significant initiative comprising a 400-megawatt solar facility with an accompanying 400-megawatt battery, exemplifies NV Energy’s commitment to renewable energy expansion.

“Our Greenlink transmission line and other upcoming projects, including solar developments in the Amargosa Valley, demonstrate our proactive approach to meeting future energy needs sustainably,” Cannon said.

The Greenlink Nevada project, projected at $2.9 billion, aims to span 585 miles of transmission lines and is slated for completion by December 2028. NV Energy’s energy roadmap also includes the retirement of its last coal-fired plant, the North Valmy Generating Station, which will be converted to natural gas, slashing carbon emissions by 50 percent.

“This strategic evolution underscores our dedication to environmental stewardship while accommodating Northern Nevada’s burgeoning data center industry,” concluded Cannon, highlighting NV Energy’s pivotal role in shaping the region’s energy future amidst unprecedented growth.

Critics say that these so-called green projects are part of the reason the state is seeing skyrocketing energy prices.

It was only a dream, as I was soon to find out. But my friend Alexia and I were arguing.

What we were arguing about, I don’t know. It was a heated exchange.

We were standing at a square table. Alexia was at one end, and I was at the other.

Exasperated, Alexia called me a dirty name before shouting, “Eat me!”

The look on her face after yelling the expression was one of shock. It became apparent that she was surprised those words came out of her mouth.

I looked at her and replied, “Certainly.”

She got that silly grin she gets when caught off guard, and together, we started laughing, and I woke up. My first thought upon waking was, “Why can’t I ever finish a dream in peace without that damned alarm clock interrupting me.”

Now, I’ll never know what we were arguing about.

The scheduled certification of the recount for the Tuesday, June 11 primary election was postponed, raising concerns about the integrity of the electoral process in Washoe County. Set for 8 a.m. on Tuesday, July 2, the certification is rescheduled for 10 a.m. on Tuesday, July 9, during the regularly scheduled county commission meeting.

The Washoe County Registrar of Voters (ROV) cited an overload of scanner machines as the cause for the delay. Despite initial claims that the recount was nearly complete on Sunday, the process is dragging out with a minimal crew, using only two or three scanners.

Observers question the county’s reluctance to conduct a hand count, which was fully funded by the Franklin Project and demanded by three candidates. A machine recount is a waste because it will produce the same results as the initial count.

Amid this controversy, the Franklin Project conducted a forensic analysis of the election results using ChatGPT, data from the Washoe County ROV, and findings from Edward Solomon on election fraud (see November 6, 2022, “In the Numbers.”) The outcome indicated a 99 percent likelihood of manipulation in the certified election results for Washoe County, particularly in the races of Beth Smith, Perry Rosenstein, and Clara Andriola.

The forensic analysis revealed several findings, including multiple precincts reporting identical total ballot counts, suggesting data manipulation with a probability of approximately 99.99 percent. Several precincts reported identical vote proportions for listed candidates, indicating tampering with a probability of 99.999 percent.

Identical proportions of Election Day votes across precincts were found, suggesting adjusted vote counts to match specific ratios. There are also the same findings in mail-in votes across precincts, indicating potential tampering with a probability of approximately 99.995 percent.

Manipulation in favor of Smith, Andriola, and Rosenstein was found strongly suggesting that the election results are not a true reflection of the voters’ will. Immediate involvement of law enforcement is warranted.

Given the high probability of manipulation, the county commissioners should not certify the election as legitimate. The public’s trust in the election process hinges on the county’s willingness to address these allegations transparently and lawfully.

Again, the rescheduled certification will happen at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, July 9, at the Board of County Commissioners meeting location. Every concerned citizen should attend and voice their concerns peacefully.

At a meeting held Monday night, June 24, at Boomtown Casino, the Washoe County Republican Party rejected my friend Cher Daniels’ nomination for central committee membership.

Daniels, who has served on the Washoe County Republican Party’s executive board for six years and led the Sparks Republican Women for six years, is currently a leader with the Nevada Federation of Republican Women. Despite her extensive involvement, they rejected her because she undermined the GOP’s call for unity.

“They claim that they want unity and they want more members,” Daniels stated, “but what they did last night was definitely not unity.”

The rejection stems from Daniels hosting a meet-and-greet campaign event for Washoe County Commissioner Clara Andriola, who was expelled from the county party in January for not consistently aligning with other Republicans in her votes.

Daniels expressed frustration at not being allowed to defend herself at the meeting.

“By not allowing me to speak and have free will to support who I want to support publicly or privately,” she said, “it’s a Communist kind of way of thinking, in my view.”

Andriola, who recently won her Republican primary race for Washoe County District 4, was equally perplexed by their actions towards Daniels.

“The Washoe GOP seems to be abandoning the big tent in favor of a tiny tent,” Andriola remarked. “I can’t explain it. But it seems to me any organization that depends heavily on volunteers would want to draw people in, not push people out.”

Requests for comment from the Washoe County Republican Party leadership remain unanswered.

The recount of ballots on Sunday, June 30, in Washoe County has ignited more controversy and raised serious questions about the transparency and integrity of the election process.

Initially, the county denied media access to the observation area during the recount for three candidates challenging the results from the June 11 primary. After about 45 minutes and mounting pressure, the press was allowed in.

Critics argue that the machine recount, ordered and certified by Clara Andriola, is a repeat of the same process with the same expected results. The core issue, they contend, is the county’s refusal to conduct a hand count recount, which had been fully funded by the Franklin Project, demanded by both the candidates and the organization, and Nevada law mandates.

The refusal has led to three lawsuits, three injunctions, and three temporary restraining orders by the candidates. Critics say the recount should not have happened until a judge could rule on the appropriate method. Instead, the county proceeded with the machine recount on a Sunday, bypassing the judicial process.

The Franklin Project and the candidates argue that a hand recount is essential for checks and balances, accountability, and transparency. They assert that simply running the ballots through the same machines will not uncover any discrepancies or errors that may have occurred.

Despite concerns, the county appears to have manipulated the narrative by controlling media coverage and dismissing the demands for a hand recount. Opponents claim the approach undermines public trust and disenfranchises voters from all political affiliations.

The recount results will be certified on Tuesday at 8 a.m. at the Board of County Commissioners meeting location. Opponents of the machine recount are urging the public to show up peacefully and voice their concerns. They argue that this issue affects all voters, regardless of party affiliation, and for greater transparency and adherence to the law.

The ongoing controversy has left many questioning what the county might be hiding and why it is resistant to providing the same level of scrutiny and verification that is standard in other areas of public life. Critics say that the actions are damaging the perception of free and fair elections and are calling for an end to such practices.

As the debate continues, the public is left to wonder why the county is so opposed to a hand recount and what it might mean for the future of election integrity in Washoe County.

A significant topic of discussion surrounding Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) revolves around her transition from bartender to congresswoman with a congressional salary of $155 thousand and a purported net worth of $26 million.

Critics use this to imply corruption. However, the deeper, more systemic issue is the very nature of how Congress compensates its members.

The Founding Fathers originally envisioned members of Congress being paid per diem rather than receiving an annual salary. The per diem system was to prevent legislators from becoming wealthy through their positions, ensuring that public service remained just that – service to the public.

The Founders aimed for a government run by “citizen legislators” who would serve temporarily and return to their regular professions, avoiding the rise of career politicians. The approach encouraged lawmakers to work efficiently and avoid prolonging sessions unnecessarily, as their compensation would be tied directly to their active workdays.

Additionally, the system accounted for the varying lengths of congressional sessions and the different distances members had to travel from their home states, and it allowed for adjustments based on economic conditions without needing a fixed salary. It aligned with the vision of a limited federal government, where serving in Congress was a temporary duty, not a long-term career.

Another layer of the problem is that members of Congress have the authority to determine their salaries. This situation, and their exemptions from laws that apply to the private sector and the executive branch, creates a fertile ground for systemic issues.

Congress is not required to keep detailed workplace records like private sector employers. There are fewer protections against retaliation for congressional employees when compared to those in the private sector.

Congress is almost entirely exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, which limits transparency. Congressional employees have fewer protections when they report misconduct, and Congress is not subject to the same scrutiny regarding workplace health and safety as other employers.

These exemptions and self-regulated salaries foster an environment where ethical lapses occur, leading to public distrust. Reverting to a per diem system and removing exemptions would be a move toward rebuilding public trust and ensuring that serving in Congress is genuinely about public service rather than personal gain.

A per diem system would discourage unnecessarily long legislative sessions, aligning with the idea that a government that legislates less interferes less with citizens’ lives. Ensuring lawmakers get paid for actual work done, rather than receiving a blanket salary, would encourage efficiency and accountability.

So, while focusing on individual figures like AOC might draw attention to potential corruption, the issue lies in congressional compensation and accountability created by our so-called public servants without the people’s realization.

A group of officials, including figures from Washoe County and the state of Nevada, have been hit with temporary restraining orders (TROs) halting the recount of votes cast in the June 11 Primary Election. The TRO filings are in response to planned recount activities set to begin before a court ruling on a preliminary injunction.

Individuals and Entities Named in TROs:

• Cari Ann Burgess, individually and as Registrar of Voters
• Mikki Huntsman, individually and as city clerk for the City of Reno City of Reno, Nevada
• Washoe County Registrar of Voters
• Eric Brown, individually and as Washoe County Manager
• Alexis Hill, individually and as Chairwoman of the Washoe County Board of Commissioners
• Washoe County
• Francisco Aguilar, individually and as Secretary of State
• Nevada Secretary of StateNevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, individually and as Nevada Attorney General
• DOES I through X and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive

The TROs aim to prevent the defendants from conducting the recount before the court can rule on the motion for a preliminary injunction.

According to the motion, the Washoe County Registrar of Voters plans to commence the recount on Sunday, June 30, despite the pending court ruling. Emails from the Washoe County District Attorney’s office confirmed these plans, with the recount set to begin early Sunday morning and finish over the weekend.

The plaintiff asserts that the recount should be conducted by hand, as allowed by law, not by machine. They argue that conducting a machine recount violates their right to inspect each ballot by hand.

The candidates cover the costs of recounts, which do not burden taxpayers, the state, or the county. Meanwhile, the plaintiff is questioning these official’s determination to proceed with a machine recount, suggesting that their actions may be an attempt to conceal issues with the election process.

The filing and subsequent actions have sparked significant controversy and distrust among the public. Critics argue that the official’s refusal to allow a hand recount undermines confidence in the electoral process.

They suggest that the media’s portrayal of the recount dispute as a partisan issue further erodes trust in election integrity. The court’s decision on the preliminary injunction will determine whether the recount proceeds as planned or halted for further review.