DEF CON, recognized as one of the oldest and largest hacking conventions, happened in Las Vegas recently.
The event featured a “Voting Village” where hackers tested the security of electronic voting systems used in numerous states and municipalities. The findings from DEF CON will be published soon, but because there are less than 90 days until the election, there is insufficient time to address the discovered vulnerabilities.
According to POLITICO, many in the election security community are concerned that the lack of a rapid response system for fixing these issues could undermine trust in the election results. Historically, DEF CON has revealed several voting machine issues, but the findings are often ignored by the government and manufacturers.
The findings revealed numerous vulnerabilities consistent with those discovered in previous years. Voting machine vulnerabilities have been a topic of concern for over a decade, with Democrats and Republicans raising alarms about these issues in elections they have lost.
In 2016, Democracy Now warned about electronic voting machines, citing claims that such machines have historically been unreliable and have led to election manipulation.
The issue of election security has seen notable political figures also raising concerns. Democratic Senators Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, and Ron Wyden challenged the security of voting machines before the 2018 midterm elections, questioning their integrity.
The recent DEF CON findings are particularly concerning in Nevada, where close tabulations can significantly impact state and city leadership. The persistent and unresolved nature of these vulnerabilities raises questions about the effectiveness of any fixes that may have been implemented or reported by election officials.
Further complicating the situation is the rushed validation process for a new election reporting system, Voter Registration and Election Management Solution (VREMS), being implemented by Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar. Concerns remain about the rapid rollout of VREMS and the impact on election integrity following a glitch in the Presidential Preference Primary that led to public backlash and an emergency meeting.
Aguilar has since apologized for the glitch, attributing it to a technical error, and reassured voters of Nevada’s commitment to secure and fair elections. However, the rapid changes to election laws by Nevada Democrats during a pandemic and ongoing concerns about election security and unaddressed vulnerabilities have eroded confidence in the election process.