Dr. Terence McAllister, a humble physician of the youthful persuasion in the neon-lit expanse of Las Vegas, spends his days peering into ears, diagnosing the common colds of the world, and dispensing remedies to children who would much rather be anywhere else. But lo! His work, it seems, lies not in mere tonics and treatments but in the finer art of conversation—like the merits of the latest video game or the nuances of an adolescent existential crisis.
Now, one might think a doctor’s business is ailments of the flesh—fevers, coughs, the occasional peanut lodged in an orifice—but Dr. McAllister finds himself navigating the tempestuous seas of modern identity discourse. And as the Silver State suffers a scarcity of pediatricians, second only to the barren wastelands of Idaho, he finds himself swapping his stethoscope for a lobbyist’s badge, embarking on that grand and time-honored American pastime: persuading politicians.
His latest cause? A bill, SB171, protects Nevada physicians from the long arm of the out-of-state law should they provide gender-affirming care to their patients. For the uninitiated, the phrase encompasses a broad swath of medical, mental, and social affirmations—ranging from calling young Timothy “Tina” to the more controversial realm of pharmaceutical and surgical interventions.
Senator James Ohrenschall, the bill’s sponsor, believes such measures are necessary to shield Nevada’s medical folk from prosecution in lands beyond the horizon, where officials take a dim view of such practices. Governor Joe Lombardo, for his part, has been less enthusiastic in years past, striking down a similar measure in 2023 for fear of meddling too with state oversight. But hope springs eternal in the legislative heart–and Ohrenschall has returned with a revised version, hoping the governor might wield his pen in favor rather than against.
The doctor, for his part, insists that these matters—social affirmation, mental health support, and medical treatment—are crucial to the well-being of transgender youth, who face higher risks of distress and despair. He warns that failure to pass such protections will leave Nevada’s physicians vulnerable to legal harpoons from less permissive states, where legislation against such practices grows like weeds in a neglected field.
Yet, a curious observer might raise an eyebrow at the notion of an ear, nose, and throat specialist venturing so fervently into the political fray. Once, doctors merely concerned themselves with the body; now, they wade into the grand social experiment of human self-reinvention.
What a time to be alive!
And so, Nevada finds itself at a crossroads. Shall it be a haven for physicians untethered by laws beyond its borders? Or shall it heed the cautious voice of governance that fears too hasty a stride in uncertain waters? The Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor will soon weigh the matter, and if the bill once again finds itself at the governor’s desk, the great gamble of politics will play out once more.
Meanwhile, Dr. McAllister, no doubt, will continue his work—peering into ears, discussing the finer points of Mario Kart, and wondering if he should have just stuck to sore throats and chickenpox.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment