Redrawing Monument Boundaries

A Good Thing for Nevada

As part of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to put America’s energy needs first, federal officials are looking into redrawing the boundaries of certain national monuments—especially those established by previous administrations. It aligns with the February 18 order from Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to submit plans.

Now, some are already wringing their hands about this. Conservation groups are naturally concerned that the Trump administration might shrink or eliminate monuments like Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante in Utah.

They’ve been vocal about how these places should be left untouched. But let’s get something straight–the people who live in these areas should have the final say—not distant bureaucrats or environmentalists who don’t have to deal with the real-world implications of these decisions.

These areas aren’t just scenic vistas; they’re on valuable natural resources like coal and uranium. These resources could be key to America’s future energy independence. Shrinking some of these protected areas is sensible—it’s also essential for economic development and the future of communities that rely on these industries.

Trump’s first term saw a reduction in the size of these monuments, and it’s clear that the current administration is looking to continue that effort. It’s not about disrespecting the land but recognizing economic growth and energy independence. You can’t simply ignore that these lands contain precious resources that can power our nation and support countless jobs.

Despite the clamor from environmental groups, remember that these monuments, while significant, have also sparked conflict with residents who don’t want their livelihoods restricted. As the legal challenges to Trump’s previous reductions continue to simmer, one thing is clear: the people who live in these areas have a right to decide what happens to their land. It’s time we start listening to those voices instead of letting a select few in Washington dictate what’s best for all of us.

In Nevada, where development and clean energy projects often stall due to the creation of new monuments, it’s time to consider whether these designations benefit the people who call these places home. It’s not about protections; it’s about striking the right balance between preserving the land and local economies having the space to thrive.