Fresh allegations of voter fraud have surfaced in Nevada, centered on a proposed constitutional amendment that passed with significant opposition from Republican voters. Critics allege the results were manipulated during the vote-counting process, citing unusual statistical trends in reported data from Washoe County.
The ballot measure, which grants expanded abortion rights up to nine months, has drawn sharp criticism from Republican, pro-life, and conservative organizations. These groups argue that the data behind the vote count, not when cast, reveals discrepancies indicating possible manipulation. According to detractors, Republican “no” votes initially showed overwhelming support at 70 percent but declined to 49 percent when tabulated.
In contrast, Democratic support for the measure remained consistently low throughout the counting process, ranging between five and ten percent. Analysts challenging the results have described this trend as statistically improbable, claiming it exceeds a 100-sigma threshold—a concept denoting extreme improbability in mathematical terms.
Critics have called for immediate action, arguing that if the results are allowed to stand, the amendment will become law, enshrining expanded abortion access into the state constitution. Voting activists urged the GOP, RNC, and pro-life organizations to contest the election, saying that constitutional amendments differ from individual races, making them available to a challenge by anyone.
The controversy has reignited debates about election integrity in Nevada, with some calling for sweeping reforms, including banning electronic vote tabulation systems. Advocates for manual voting methods argue that only hand-counted ballots can ensure transparent and verifiable election outcomes.
Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar has not yet commented on these new claims, but election officials have previously stood by the state voting processes.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment