In the wake of recent global IT disruptions, legacy media is portraying these events as separate events to downplay the influence of deep-seated political agendas. Legacy media and its lack of coverage continue as it purposefully obscures the connections between CrowdStrike and Project 2025.
CrowdStrike, a player in the cybersecurity realm, recently faced backlash after a so-called faulty update led to widespread IT disruptions affecting various sectors worldwide. This incident is part of a larger narrative involving Project 2025, a policy blueprint developed by the Heritage Foundation and former Trump administration officials.
Criticized as an autocratic agenda, Project 2025 proposes dramatic changes to U.S. nuclear policy and infrastructure, including the revival of Nuclear weapons testing and the controversial Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. The potential shift in policy has raised alarms among Trump critics, pumped up by misleading media reports, who see it as a strategic move to influence U.S. nuclear policy and undermine political opposition.
Despite the significant implications of Project 2025, legacy media coverage has often framed these developments as standard political maneuvers, minimizing the potential consequences. The downplaying of the situation aligns with concerns that powerful interests are using media narratives to obscure their agenda, as they did with the Steele Dossier and the Hunter Biden laptop.
Former chief of staff for Trump, Mark Meadows, a part of Jeffrey Epstein’s brother’s charity, Humpty Dumpty Institute, and adviser Stephen Miller, who each betrayed Trump, are figures behind Project 2025, adding to the need to take a closer look at its proposals. The document advocates for the modernization of nuclear infrastructure and suggests rejecting the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, a move that could have substantial impacts on national and global security.
While legacy media purposefully focuses on items that might be conservative policies, they avoid Project 2025 planned mass deportations, raising prescription drug prices, cutting Social Security, raising the retirement age, ending marriage equality, and banning Muslims from entering the country.
These drastic measures are attempts to paint Trump in a negative light and discourage conservative voters.
One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its stance on immigration. The document calls for mass deportations without distinguishing between illegal immigrants and foreign nationals.
It directly contradicts Trump’s earlier statements about allowing students with diplomas from American institutions to stay in the country. By failing to make this distinction, Project 2025 appears to go against Trump’s stated policies and paints a picture of indiscriminate and harsh immigration enforcement.
The proposal to raise prescription drug prices and cut Social Security benefits further adds to the controversy. These measures would likely be deeply unpopular among voters, particularly older Americans who rely on these programs. Additionally, raising the retirement age and ending marriage equality are seen as regressive steps that could alienate key voter demographics.
Banning Muslims from entering the country is another divisive proposal in Project 2025. The policy echoes earlier, widely criticized attempts to restrict immigration based on religion, which many view as discriminatory and un-American.
The extreme nature of these proposals proves that Project 2025 is not by the Heritage Foundation but is a psychological weapon designed to influence voter behavior. By associating Trump with these ideas, the project aims to discourage conservatives from supporting him in the upcoming election.
Observers suggest that this strategy is part of a broader effort to prevent Trump from returning to office. The deep state and its allies are using Project 2025 to create a narrative that discredits Trump and frightens voters away from his campaign.
The tendency of legacy media to gloss over the connections between these things and their broader implications reflects a troubling trend of protecting powerful interests and minimizing critical issues. The legacy media distorts public perception by underreporting the significance of the CrowdStrike IT disruptions and Project 2025.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment