As the dust settles from the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, the official story presented to the public leaves many unanswered questions. With a tinfoil hat firmly in place, it’s time to delve into the possibility that there’s more to this story than meets the eye.
Firstly, the notion of there being two shooters is not far-fetched. Reports have surfaced suggesting this possibility.
Adding to this is a suspicious white van, swiftly disregarded by authorities, and it is conceivable that the vehicle was a mobile command center or a getaway vehicle for the actual shooter, conveniently ignored to fit the single-shooter narrative.
The alleged assassin, a 20-year-old with no apparent social media history, seems too perfect as the fall guy. Could he have been coerced into this role?
The theory that after being caught engaging in illicit online activities and blackmailed is worth considering. The lack of a digital footprint could indicate a deliberate scrubbing of online presence, preparing to be the patsy in this high-stakes drama.
It’s crucial to note that this young man was conspicuously spotted 30 minutes before the shots were fired, positioned in an area where numerous witnesses could see him. This visibility makes him the perfect distraction, akin to the misdirection used in a magic trick. While all eyes were on him, the trained shooter could have been operating from a hidden vantage point, out of the view of cameras.
The idea that he managed to outsmart the United States Secret Service and get eight shots off at Trump because of a “sloped roof” is dubious. The more plausible explanation is that he was supposed to fail, a pawn where the true culprits remain hidden.
How was this young man identified so quickly? He had no ID on him, yet authorities claim they swiftly matched his DNA.
It is suspicious, especially considering he had a clean record, meaning his DNA shouldn’t have been on file. This rapid identification raises red flags, similar to the convenient discovery of passports at the scene of 9/11, which many have questioned over the years.
The theory, while speculative, shows the inconsistencies in the official narrative. The speed at which authorities have presented their case and the glaring gaps in their story suggest a deeper conspiracy.
The possibility of another shooter, a manipulated fall guy, and the involvement of powerful entities orchestrating the event cannot be ruled out. While dismissing this as mere conspiracy, the unexplained details warrant a thorough investigation.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment