Nevada Supreme Court Denies Third Beadles Appeal

The Nevada Supreme Court has unanimously ruled against Robert Beadles for the third time, declining to explain their decision.

Beadles, a vocal critic of the state election processes, expressed his frustration while planning to move the case to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).

“My case is very clear, and there is no legitimate reason a just court would not at least grant me leave to amend the complaint,” Beadles said in a statement. “Every attorney and judge outside of those involved in this case who have read my appeal and pleadings are completely disgusted with what the Nevada courts have done. They can’t believe what’s happened to the courts in Nevada.”

Beadles has been an outspoken critic of the Nevada election system. He believes that his legal challenges and the evidence he has presented have made him a target for coordinated attacks by the judicial system and the media.

“I guess when you call out the ‘servants,’ sue them, show so many issues with the elections, and provide the receipts to back it up, these seven people have no appetite to do what’s constitutionally required of them and what is right and just,” Beadles continued.

Determined to continue his fight, Beadles announced his intention to take his case to the high court.

“Now I’ll file in the Supreme Court of the United States and see if they even take the case, and if they do, whether they will agree with me or with what these three courts have done to me, my case, our rights, and what they have allowed to happen to all of us,” he stated. “We’ll have to wait and see.”

Beadles expressed his dismay at the current state of the judicial system in Nevada and the broader implications for democracy.

“It’s a sad day for Nevada. Our founding fathers would be disgusted,” he remarked.

Despite the setbacks, Beadles remains resolute.

“By now, you should know me well enough,” he said. “There’s not an ounce of quit in me. I’m far from done, and it’s far from over.”

Beadles also addressed the perceived coordination between the media and judicial decisions.

“Have you noticed how the media relentlessly libels and slanders me, then the court makes a ruling like this, and they rinse and repeat the cycle?” he said. “Do any of you have any doubts about how coordinated these attacks are? What are they so afraid of… I think most of us know.”

Beadles did not elaborate on a timeline for his plans to file with the SCOTUS.