KOLO-TV recently aired a segment about the election process in Washoe County, featuring the new Deputy Registrar, Andrew McDonald. Previously in charge of election systems in San Diego County, McDonald will oversee election centers, personnel, equipment, and training in Washoe County.
However, the segment mistakenly referred to the upcoming primary as occurring on June 11, 2023, rather than 2024, raising concerns about accuracy. The new appointment of the ROV and Deputy ROV have also prompted skepticism about potential changes in the election process.
Critics argue that the planned observation of the election process is inadequate. Despite the county population exceeding 500,000, only two representatives from each of the Republican and Democratic parties, along with four from other parties, will be permitted to observe the ballot processing center. It has led to accusations of secrecy and non-compliance with state laws and court orders that require public observation.
In previous elections, Washoe County violated laws and court orders by counting votes in private. Although cameras are in place and limited party representatives can observe, critics insist this does not meet legal standards.
In previous elections, Washoe County violated laws and court orders by counting votes in secret, although cameras are in place and limited party representatives can observe. Critics insist this does not meet legal standards.
The recent KOLO segment has received criticism for being a propaganda piece, misleading the public into believing that the election process will be fully transparent. Observers argue that simply watching figures on video is inadequate for ensuring compliance with laws regarding signature verification, chain of custody, and ballot tabulation.
Reports about improper handling of ballots, including multiple versions of a ballot sent to the same registered voter, are emerging throughout Washoe County, raising concerns about potential double voting. Despite assurances from the Secretary of State that this has not happened, witnesses claim fraudulent votes are preventing legitimate voters from casting new ballots to correct these errors.
The issues, combined with the significant financial expenditure on elections, cast doubt on the integrity of the process. Critics argue that the election system must be more transparent and accountable to restore public trust.
In response to these concerns, there have been calls for legal action. The county could face injunctions for failing to follow election laws, with the added demands for criminal charges against those responsible for the breaches.
The recent Nevada Supreme Court ruling against Robert Beadles’ grievances has further fueled the controversy. He argued that election officials, including the Secretary of State, improperly dismissed his grievances and that the ruling undercuts the enforcement of court orders and public accountability.
Beadles plans to appeal, emphasizing that selective enforcement of laws threatens the foundation of democracy in Nevada.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment