As President Joe Biden and Donald Trump intensify their campaigning in key battleground states, a quieter battle unfolds in the legal arena, shaping the landscape for the upcoming 2024 election.
The Republican National Committee (RNC) has ramped up its litigation efforts, filing election-related lawsuits in nearly half of the states, signaling a strategic move to influence voting and election administration.
Recent lawsuits over voter roll maintenance in Michigan and Nevada highlight the RNC’s concerted effort to challenge various aspects of voting procedures.
With internal changes within the RNC, legal maneuvering has emerged as a pivotal strategy for the party, serving as a tool for campaign messaging, fundraising, and sowing doubts about the validity of election outcomes. Danielle Alvarez, a senior adviser to the RNC and the Trump campaign, emphasized the significance of these lawsuits, stating that they are a top priority for the organization and align with Trump’s vision for the RNC’s year-round activities.
However, Democrats and legal experts caution against the potential consequences of such litigation. They warn that the proliferation of lawsuits could overwhelm election officials and erode voter confidence in election results.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has responded with its legal strategy, investing resources in voter protection initiatives to counter the GOP’s efforts to restrict access to the polls.
Despite the unsuccessful legal challenges following the 2020 election, the surge in election-related lawsuits persists, indicating a trend expected to continue into the 2024 election cycle. Both parties seem to have embraced litigation as a staple of their political strategies, reflecting the increasingly contentious nature of electoral politics.
The RNC’s litigation targets include voter ID rules, mail ballots, and absentee voting procedures. Critics of these lawsuits argue that they rely on flawed data and risk disenfranchising legitimate voters, echoing concerns raised by legal experts and democracy advocates.
While most of the lawsuits are unlikely to succeed in court, they serve a dual purpose of fundraising and shaping public perception of election integrity. Moreover, they pose a potential threat to the smooth conduct of elections and the timely certification of results, raising fears of post-election chaos and uncertainty.
The Old Blog in the Desert 
Leave a comment