Upholding Constitutional Principles in the Middle of Government Overreach

Prepare yourself as I present some mild truths that may provoke or confound you.

Allowing the federal government to wield the power to ban any business, including TikTok, is troubling enough. Yet, it plunges to new depths of ignorance and authoritarianism when we permit the President to wield such authority.

This erosion of constitutional boundaries reveals a profound disregard for the limited scope of federal power. It only exacerbates the consequences of a populace misled, naive, and ultimately enslaved by their acquiescence.

Worse, the political party perpetrating this scam is the same that professes to champion small government, conservatism, and constitutional fidelity—the Republicans.

Only willful ignorance or deception can anyone perceive this as a positive development. It lacks constitutional authorization and goes against the principles enshrined within the Constitution.

The control of property equates to ownership of property. When the government seizes control, individuals possess nothing and become enslaved.

Don’t be fooled into believing that such measures only target “foreign-owned businesses.” Recall the assurances made regarding the Patriot Act. It’s merely a pretext to coerce your consent to your subjugation.

Now, onto another contentious viewpoint.

A federal judge in Illinois has recently affirmed that the Constitution safeguards the gun rights of noncitizens who enter the United States unlawfully.

In this regard, she is unequivocally correct. Our rights are inherent, bestowed by our Creator, and merely acknowledged by the government.
Her interpretation, though misguided, serves as a reminder that all gun regulations represent infringements upon our liberties.

If individuals who are in the country illegally can rightfully possess firearms due to their natural, God-given rights, then surely, the same applies to us as citizens. It’s time to leverage this understanding against those who seek to undermine the Second Amendment for the benefit of the U.S. citizen.

Comments

Leave a comment