The Washoe County School District (WCSD) is at the center of a heated debate over its proposed sex-education curriculum, called Sexuality, Health, And Responsibility Education (SHARE,) designed for 4th and 5th graders aged 9-11.
It has drawn attention for aligning with the National Sexuality Education Standards (NSES), developed by a coalition of progressive organizations, including LGBTQIA+ nonprofits, Planned Parenthood, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and Advocates for Youth. The proposed sex-ed curriculum aims to provide students with information about puberty, reproductive health, and gender identity.
Notably, it deviates from traditional terminology, seldom mentioning “female” and “male” but instead using “bodies with vulvas” and “bodies with penises” to discuss bodily changes during puberty. Critics argue that this approach may confuse children and overlook the importance of clear biological distinctions.
The NSES, to which the proposed curriculum is aligned, encompasses a comprehensive set of sex education standards designed for K-12 students and educators. While some proponents commend its inclusive approach that covers sexual orientation, gender identity, and reproductive justice, opponents argue that it introduces sensitive topics too early for young students.
By the end of the 5th grade, the proposed curriculum expects students to understand basic gender identity and sexual orientation. It aims to promote inclusivity and awareness by discussing diverse experiences of attraction and love, but critics argue that these discussions may be premature for students of this age group.
Some parents and community members have expressed concerns about the involvement of certain partner organizations in developing the NSES and, subsequently, the proposed curriculum. Organizations that developed the curriculum have been labeled “extreme-left, progressive organizations” by critics, stemming from their positions on reproductive health, social justice, and advocacy for LGBTQIA+ rights.
Opponents are calling for greater transparency and parental involvement in the decision-making process. They argue that parents should have a say in their children’s sex education and the option to opt-out if they find the content inappropriate for their child’s age.
The Old Blog in the Desert 